Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms and experimental and epidemiological evidence relating dietary fibre (non-starch polysaccharides) and starch to protection against large bowel cancer

Open access
Bingham, Sheila A.·1990·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Abstract

The cause of human colo-rectal cancer is unknown, although international and racial comparisons suggest that diet may be important. Within populations, risk of cancer is also affected by genetic factors which remain to be elucidated. Dietary fibre and NSP consumption is not always high in populations at low risk of colo-rectal cancer, but rates are fast increasing with westernization (and meat and fat consumption) in Japan. The suggestion that dietary fibre is protective in colo-rectal cancer is based on the fact that cereal fibre from bran increases faecal weight, dilutes large intestinal contents, and speeds up transit time. In animal models, bran reduces the number of tumours induced by chemical carcinogens, and cellulose may have a similar effect. The faeces of some individuals contain mutagens, some of which have been identified as fecapentaenes and heterocyclic amines. Bran reduces faecal mutagenicity, although the mutagen concerned is unknown. Most dietary fibre is fermented in the large gut by anaerobic bacteria and little remains in faecal matter. Recent observations have shown that substantial amounts of starch survive digestion in the small bowel and are available also for fermentation in the large gut. The metabolic consequences of fermentation may be important in carcinogenesis via altered N metabolism, SCFA production, and pH reduction. Methane is also produced in some individuals, but, contrary to previous findings, is not a risk factor for large bowel cancer. Starch appears to be beneficial as a substrate for fermentation because yields of the SCFA butyrate are increased both in vitro and in vivo. Butyrate is an energy substrate for the colonic mucosa and an anti-proliferative and differentiating agent in cell culture lines. Possible mechanisms whereby starch and NSP may protect against colo-rectal cancer, therefore, exist. The majority of individual case-control epidemiological studies suggest that fibre-containing foods are protective in colo-rectal cancer, although this effect is largely due to vegetable, rather than cereal, consumption. Case-control studies of diet and large bowel cancer may, however, reflect the effect rather than the cause of the disease, so that confirmation of the possible protective effects of starch and NSP is needed from accurate prospective studies both of diet and associated risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/pns19900021

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Bingham, S. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
1990-07
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
153-171
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W2098518096
Cited by
203
References
1
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms and experimental and epidemiological evidence relating dietary fibre (non-starch polysaccharides) and starch to protection against large bowel cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/pns19900021
The paper
Bingham, S. A. (1990). Mechanisms and experimental and epidemiological evidence relating dietary fibre (non-starch polysaccharides) and starch to protection against large bowel cancer. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. https://doi.org/10.1079/pns19900021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.