The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modulation of post-operative insulin resistance by pre-operative carbohydrate loading
Open accessAbstract
Insulin resistance develops as a response to virtually all types of surgical stress. There is an increasing body of evidence that suggests that insulin resistance in surgical stress is not beneficial for outcome. A recent large study in intensive-care patients showed that aggressive treatment of insulin resistance using intravenous insulin reduced mortality and morbidity substantially. Similarly, in burn patients, intensive insulin and glucose treatment has been shown to improve N economy and enhance skin-graft healing. In surgical patients insulin resistance has been characterized in some detail, and has been shown to have many similarities with metabolic changes seen in patients with type 2 diabetes. This finding may be important since insulin resistance has been shown to be one independent factor that influences length of stay. When patients about to undergo elective surgery have been treated with glucose intravenously or a carbohydrate-rich drink instead of overnight fasting, insulin resistance was reduced by about half. A small meta-analysis showed that when post-operative insulin resistance was reduced by preoperative carbohydrates, length of hospital stay was shortened. Overnight intravenous glucose at high doses improved post-operative N economy. This type of treatment has also been shown repeatedly to reduce cardiac complications after open-heart surgery. Furthermore, if the carbohydrates are given as a drink pre-operatively, pre-operative thirst, hunger and anxiety are markedly reduced. In summary, preventing or treating insulin resistance in surgical stress influences outcome. Fasting overnight is not an optimal way to prepare patients for elective surgery. Instead, pre-operative carbohydrates have clinical benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including Organ Transplantation
Weimann, A., Braga, M., Harsanyi, L., Laviano, A., Ljungqvist, O., Soeters, P., Jauch, K. W., Kemen, M., Hiesmayr, J. M., Horbach, T., et al. (2006) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.015 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationLow, D. E., Allum, W., De Manzoni, G., Ferri, L., Immanuel, A., Kuppusamy, M., Law, S., Lindblad, M., Maynard, N., Neal, J., et al. (2019) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4 · Cited by 641
Self-citationLassen, K., Coolsen, M. M. E., Slim, K., Carli, F., de Aguilar‐Nascimento, J. E., Schäfer, M., Parks, R. W., Fearon, K. C. H., Lobo, D. N., Demartines, N., et al. (2013) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1771-1 · Cited by 473
Self-citationGatt, M., Anderson, A. D. G., Reddy, B. S., Hayward-Sampson, P., Tring, I. C., & MacFie, J. (2005) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5187 · Cited by 316
Hausel, J., Nygren, J., Thorell, A., Lagerkranser, M., & Ljungqvist, O. (2005) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4901 · Cited by 280
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ljungqvist, O., Nygren, J., & Thorell, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-336
- ISSN
- 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2719
- OpenAlex
- W2040454056
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modulation of post-operative insulin resistance by pre-operative carbohydrate loading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/pns2002168
- The paper
- Ljungqvist, O., Nygren, J., & Thorell, A. (2002). Modulation of post-operative insulin resistance by pre-operative carbohydrate loading. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. https://doi.org/10.1079/pns2002168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.