Cited by 204Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsClimate Change Policy and EconomicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soils as carbon sinks: the global context

Smith, P.·2004·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

Abstract. Soil carbon sequestration could meet at most about one‐third of the current yearly increase in atmospheric CO 2 ‐carbon, but the duration of the effect would be limited, with significant impacts lasting only 20–50 years. Coupled with this limited duration, increases in population and per‐capita energy demand mean that soil carbon sequestration could play only a minor role in closing the difference between predicted and target carbon emissions by 2100. However, if atmospheric CO 2 concentrations are to be stabilized at reasonable levels (450–650 ppm), drastic reductions in carbon emissions will be required over the next 20–30 years. Given this, carbon sequestration should form a central role in any portfolio of measures to reduce atmospheric CO 2 concentrations over this crucial period, while new energy technologies are developed and implemented. International agreements, such as the Kyoto Protocol, encourage soil carbon sequestration and could be used to formulate soil carbon sequestration polices. Such policies need to take account of other environmental impacts as well as political, economic and societal needs, so that they form part of a raft of measures encouraging sustainable development. Of the carbon sequestration options available, those of a ‘win–win’ nature, that is, those that increase carbon stocks at the same time as improving other aspects of the environment, and those that protect or enhance existing stocks (‘no regrets’ implementation) show the greatest promise in meeting these goals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00361.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00103-4 · DOI
  2. Cole V, 1996, Climate change 1995. Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific‐technical analyses, 745
  3. Follett RF, 2000, The potential of US Grazing lands to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect, 401, 10.1201/9781420032468-20 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.021 · DOI
  5. Houghton RA, 1999, The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850 to 1990, Tellus, 50, 298, 10.3402/tellusb.v51i2.16288 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.285.5427.574 · DOI
  7. IPCC, 1996, Climate change 1995. The second assessment report
  8. IPCC, 1997, IPCC (revised 1996) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
  9. IPCC, 2000, Special report on land use, land use change, and forestry
  10. IPCC, 2000, Special report on emissions scenarios
  11. IPCC, 2001, Climate change: the scientific basis
  12. Jenkinson DS, 1988, Russell's soil conditions and plant growth, 564
  13. Lal R, 1999, Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate the accelerated greenhouse effect, Progress in Environmental Science, 1, 307
  14. Lal R, 2004, Soil erosion and the global carbon budget, Environment International
  15. Lal R, 2004, Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change, Geoderma
  16. Lal R, 1998, The potential of US cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect
  17. Metting FB, 1999, Carbon sequestration in soils: science, monitoring and beyond, 1
  18. Paustian K, 1997, Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate CO2 emissions, Soil Use and Management, 13, 229, 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1997.tb00594.x · DOI
  19. Robertson GP, 2002, Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere, Science, 289, 1922, 10.1126/science.289.5486.1922 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00008.x · DOI
  21. Smith P, 2003, Soil biological fertility – a key to sustainable land use in agriculture
  22. 10.1007/978-3-642-61094-3_7 · DOI
  23. 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00331.x · DOI
  24. 10.1556/AAgr.48.2000.2.13 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00204.x · DOI
  26. 10.1023/A:1012617517839 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Smith, P.
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
212-218
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W2042263916
Cited by
204
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil carbon sequestration, soil carbon sink, atmospheric CO2 stabilization, carbon emission reduction, Kyoto Protocol, sustainable development, global carbon balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review