CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29Pain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

The Hypnotic Induction Profile and Absorption

Frischholz, Edward J., Spiegel, David, Trentalange, Mark J., Spiegel, Herbert·1987·American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis
DOI 10.1080/00029157.1987.10404168
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between scores on the Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) and the trait of absorption in three different clinical groups: Smokers (n = 226), Phobics (n = 95), and patients with Chronic Pain (n = 65). Two hypotheses were investigated. The first predicted that both the Eye-Roll sign (ERS) and Induction Score (IND) of the HIP would correlate similarly (r = .30) with scores on the Tellegen Absorption Scale (TAS), as has been previously reported with other measures of hypnotic responsivity in student samples. The second was that using a combination of both ERS and IND scores to predict TAS scores would result in a significant increase in forecasting accuracy over using either HIP measure alone. Both hypotheses were supported in all three clinical groups. Correlations between HIP and Absorption scores ranged from .33 to .53. Clinical and theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00029157.1987.10404168

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hypnotic analgesia is associated with reduced activity of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC).

    “Hypnotic analgesia is associated with reduced activity of the dACC57”

    From Functional Brain Basis of Hypnotizability (2012) · cites this paper as [57]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Frischholz, E. J., Spiegel, D., Trentalange, M. J., & Spiegel, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • New York Medical College (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1987-10
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
87-93
ISSN
  • 0002-9157 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-0562
DOI
10.1080/00029157.1987.10404168
OpenAlex
W1990034970
Cited by
29
References
34
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
new_edition (2014-11-06)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
hypnotic induction, hypnotic susceptibility, smokers, chronic pain patients
MeSH terms
Attention, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Male, Pain, Phobic Disorders, Tobacco Use Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review