The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Neural Networks as Statistical Tools
Abstract
Neural networks have received a great deal of attention over the last few years. They are being used in the areas of prediction and classification, areas where regression models and other related statistical techniques have traditionally been used. In this paper we discuss neural networks and compare them to regression models. We start by exploring the history of neural networks. This includes a review of relevant literature on the topic of neural networks. Neural network nomenclature is then introduced, and the backpropagation algorithm, the most widely used learning algorithm, is derived and explained in detail. A comparison between regression analysis and neural networks in terms of notation and implementation is conducted to aid the reader in understanding neural networks. We compare the performance of regression analysis with that of neural networks on two simulated examples and one example on a large dataset. We show that neural networks act as a type of nonparametric regression model, enabling us to model complex functional forms. We discuss when it is advantageous to use this type of model in place of a parametric regression model, as well as some of the difficulties in implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02478259 · Cited by 18,566
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1989) · Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems · doi:10.1007/bf02551274 · Cited by 13,883
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212
Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps
Kohonen, T. (1982) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00337288 · Cited by 9,529
Self-Organization and Associative Memory
Kohonen, T. (1989) · Springer Series in Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-88163-3 · Cited by 8,740
An introduction to computing with neural nets
Lippmann, R. (1987) · IEEE ASSP Magazine · doi:10.1109/massp.1987.1165576 · Cited by 7,825
A Learning Algorithm for Continually Running Fully Recurrent Neural Networks
Williams, R. J., & Zipser, D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.2.270 · Cited by 4,369
Cited by
Sargent, D. J. (2001) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1636::aid-cncr1176>3.0.co;2-d · Cited by 302
Timmons, A. C., Duong, J. B., Simo Fiallo, N., Lee, T., Vo, H. P. Q., Ahle, M. W., Comer, J. S., Brewer, L. C., Frazier, S. L., & Chaspari, T. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221134490 · Cited by 263
Sakar, C. O., Polat, S. O., Katircioglu, M., & Kastro, Y. (2019) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-018-3523-0 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Warner, B., & Misra, M.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 284-293
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2030444281
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Neural Networks as Statistical Tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00031305.1996.10473554
- The paper
- Warner, B., & Misra, M. (1996). Understanding Neural Networks as Statistical Tools. The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1996.10473554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.