The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coefficients of Determination for Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis
Abstract
Coefficients of determination for continuous predicted values (R 2 analogs) in logistic regression are examined for their conceptual and mathematical similarity to the familiar R 2 statistic from ordinary least squares regression, and compared to coefficients of determination for discrete predicted values (indexes of predictive efficiency). An example motivated by substantive concerns and using empirical data from a national household probability sample is presented to illustrate the behavior of the different coefficients of determination in the evaluation of models including dependent variables with different base rates—that is, different proportions of cases or observations with “positive” outcomes. One R 2 analog appears to be preferable to the others both in terms of conceptual similarity to the ordinary least squares coefficient of determination, and in terms of its relative independence from the base rate. In addition, base rate should also be considered when selecting an index of predictive efficiency. As expected, the conclusions based on R 2 analogs are not necessarily consistent with conclusions based on predictive efficiency, with respect to which of several outcomes is better predicted by a given model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination
NAGELKERKE, N. J. D. (1991) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 · Cited by 5,927
Cited by
A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x · Cited by 10,356
Chicco, D., Warrens, M. J., & Jurman, G. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.623 · Cited by 5,380
An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting
Peng, C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220670209598786 · Cited by 2,671
Tests of the three-path mediated effect
Taylor, A. B., MacKinnon, D. P., & Tein, J.-Y. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428107300344 · Cited by 1,209
“Positive” results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
Fanelli, D. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010068 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Menard, S.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-24
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W1981432147
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coefficients of Determination for Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474502
- The paper
- Menard, S. (2000). Coefficients of Determination for Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis. The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.