The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 1 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
Open accessAbstract
Emeritus of Mathematics and Statistics at
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
24 Own interpretation · 2 No basis given · 1 No full text of the sources
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The widespread use of”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Statistical significance is not equivalent to scientific, human, or economic significance.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, a p-value near 0.05 taken by itself offers only weak evidence against the null hypothesis.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By itself, a p-value does not provide a good measure of evidence regarding a model or hypothesis.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, identical estimated effects will have different p-values if the precision of the estimates differs.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A p-value provides one approach to summarizing the incompatibility between a particular set of data and a proposed model for the data.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 1. P-values can indicate how incompatible the data are with a specified statistical model.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conducting multiple analyses of the data and reporting only those with certain p-values (typically those passing a significance threshold) renders the reported p-values essentially uninterpretable.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whenever a researcher chooses what to present based on statistical results, valid interpretation of those results is severely compromised if the reader is not informed of the choice and its basis.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The smaller the p-value, the greater the statistical incompatibility of the data with the null hypothesis, if the underlying assumptions used to calculate the p-value hold.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 1. P-values can indicate how incompatible the data are with a specified statistical model.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Valid scientific conclusions based on p-values and related statistics cannot be drawn without at least knowing how many and which analyses were conducted, and how those analyses (including p-values) were selected for reporting.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
- It may state two separate claims as one. 10
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This has led to some scientific journals discouraging the use of p-values, and some scientists and statisticians recommending their abandonment, with some arguments essentially unchanged since p-values were first introduced.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The statistical community has been deeply concerned about issues of reproducibility and replicability of scientific conclusions.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the p-value can be a useful statistical measure, it is commonly misused and misinterpreted.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A conclusion does not immediately become”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All these measures and approaches rely on further assumptions, but they may more directly address the size of an effect (and its associated uncertainty) or whether the hypothesis is correct.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 4. Other Approaches
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The validity of scientific conclusions, including their reproducibility, depends on more than the statistical methods themselves.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is a statement about data in relation to a specified hypothetical explanation, and is not a statement about the explanation itself.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 2. P-values do not measure the probability that the studied hypothesis is true, or the probability that the data were produced by random chance alone.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Researchers should recognize that a p-value without context or other evidence provides limited information.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Likewise, a relatively large p-value does not imply evidence in favor of the null hypothesis; many other hypotheses may be equally or more consistent with the observed data.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This incompatibility can be interpreted as casting doubt on or providing evidence against the null hypothesis or the underlying assumptions.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 1. P-values can indicate how incompatible the data are with a specified statistical model.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Appropriately chosen techniques, properly conducted analyses and correct interpretation of statistical results also play a key role in ensuring that conclusions are sound and that uncertainty surrounding them is represented properly.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Misunderstanding or misuse of statistical inference is only one cause of the”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peng 2015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Smaller p-values do not necessarily imply the presence of larger or more important effects, and larger p-values do not imply a lack of importance or even lack of effect.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 3. Scientific conclusions and business or policy decisions should not be based only on whether a p-value passes a specific threshold.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“P-values do not measure the probability that the studied hypothesis is true, or the probability that the data were produced by random chance alone.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 2. P-values do not measure the probability that the studied hypothesis is true, or the probability that the data were produced by random chance alone.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In view of the prevalent misuses of and misconceptions concerning p-values, some statisticians prefer to supplement or even replace p-values with other approaches.”
§ The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose In > 4. Other Approaches
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
There is widespread consensus in the statistical community on the principles articulated in the ASA statement.
“according to widespread consensus in the statistical community”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While the large scale of the Tabula Muris Senis dataset provides substantial power to predict subtle changes in LR interactions, the biological complexity, dependencies among communication pairs, and multiple testing burden require that these p-values be interpreted within a broader biological and statistical context [33].”
From Quantitative profiling of lifespan-dependent cell-cell communication potential reveals dynamic ligand-receptor network shifts across mouse tissues (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These types of incorrect descriptions contribute to confirmation bias, overinterpretation of results, and reporting correlation as implied causation (Wasserstein and Lazar 2016).”
From Unethical Numbers? A Meta-analysis of Library Learning Analytics Studies (2019) · cites this paper as Wasserstein and Lazar 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is especially true of relatively large-sample-size studies (as most learning analytics studies are), which are likely to obtain statistically significant findings in relatively small variations in measures such as GPA (Field 2017; Salkind 2016 Wasserstein and Lazar 2016).”
From Unethical Numbers? A Meta-analysis of Library Learning Analytics Studies (2019) · cites this paper as Wasserstein and Lazar 2016
In the citing paper
“In 2016, the American Statistical Association released a statement on statistical significance and the P value with six principles underlying the proper use and interpretation of this statistical tool (77).”
From Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018) · cites this paper as [77]
In the citing paper
“Although we also present p values for exploratory analyses, we refrain from labeling any of them as statistically significant, following best-practice recommendations for statistical analysis [43].”
From Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Contrary to IJE author recommendations and recent guidance from the American Statistics Society, 16 Gao et al. largely base their conclusions on findings with a P -value equivalent to < 0.05 after multiple testing.”
From Commentary: Two-sample Mendelian randomization: opportunities and challenges (2016) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Following guidance,50 we focused on 95% CIs, rather than statistical significance. For example, unlike conventional interpretations, we did not outright interpret an effect estimate “non‐significant” if the lower or upper bound of the 95% CI was slightly above/below the null value; we interpreted them as “suggestive” of an effect.”
From Third‐wave cognitive behaviour therapies for weight management: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
(1947) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1947.10501534 · Cited by 3,745
The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis
Hoenig, J. M., & Heisey, D. M. (2001) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313001300339897 · Cited by 2,046
Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485 · Cited by 1,946
Smithson, M. J. (2000) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446218525 · Cited by 1,871
Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research.
Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0044139 · Cited by 1,734
Scientific method: Statistical errors
Nuzzo, R. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/506150a · Cited by 1,536
Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2008) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31818131e7 · Cited by 1,495
Sterne, J. A. C. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7280.226 · Cited by 1,466
Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.2.218 · Cited by 1,465
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Leek, J. (2014), “On the Scalability of Statistical Procedures: Why the p-Value Bashers Just Don't Get It,” Simply Statistics Blog, Available at http://simplystatistics.org/2014/02/14/on-the-scalability-of-statistical-procedures-why-the-p-value-bashers-just-dont-get-it/.
- Gelman A. and Loken E. (2014) “The Statistical Crisis in Science [online] ” American Scientist 102. Available at http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/feature/2014/6/the-statistical-crisis-in-science · DOI · Paper page
- Greenland, S., and Poole, C. (2011), “Problems in Common Interpretations of Statistics in Scientific Articles, Expert Reports, and Testimony,” Jurimetrics, 51, 113–129.
- 10.1214/13-AOS1123 · DOI
- Lavine, M. (1999), “What is Bayesian Statistics and Why Everything Else is Wrong,” UMAP Journal, 20, 2.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,101–5,200 of 6,272
Johnson, V. E. (2016) · Encyclopedia of Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0005851.pub2
Spiga, F., Lawton, M., Lightman, S. L., Smith, G. D., & Ben‐Shlomo, Y. (2021) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105577
Questions About a Risk Prediction Model of Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer
McCaw, Z. R., & Wei, L. (2021) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5701
Tracy, E., Billingsley, J., Pollack, J. M., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3947108
Accurate confidence interval estimation for non-centrality parameters and effect size indicesPreprint
Kang, K., Armstrong, K., Avery, S. N., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.05966
“This approach may help to address the limitations of null hypothesis significance testing (Wasserstein and Lazar, 2016; Wasserstein et al., 2019) and may provide guidance on whether a study finding is under-powered.”
BackgroundLin, Z., & Berry, D. A. (2021) · Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews · doi:10.31579/2692-9406/066
Gulotta, N. A. (2021) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3-kp45-d884
Confidences in HypothesesPreprint
Bornholt, G. N. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3973254
“Such outcomes would in turn provide positive benefits in terms of the reproducibility of scientific results, concerns about which have been the subject of much recent discussion (see, for example, Ioannidis 2005; Nuzzo 2014; and Wasserstein and Lazar 2016).”
BackgroundCommentary on Ellis et al. (2021)
Schmitt, S. A., Geldhof, G. J., Purpura, D. J., Duncan, R. J., & McClelland, M. M. (2021) · Journal of Numerical Cognition · doi:10.5964/jnc.7341
Li, W., Zuo, L., Ni, Y., Xiao, D., Mo, W., Wen, Z., Zhao, J., Zhang, J., & Li, Y. (2021) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2021.2008898
(2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.12453v0.2/reviews/2
“…( Chavalarias et al., 2016; Cristea & Ioannidis, 2018; Fidler et al., 2004b; Greenland et al., 2016; Holman et al., 2001; Lang, Rothman & Cann, 1998; Poole, 2001; Rothman, Greenland & Lash, 2008; Savitz, Tolo & Poole, 1994; Stang et al., 2017; Stang, Poole & Kuss, 2010; Wasserstein & Lazar, 2016 ).”
InfluentialPragmatic and Error Statistical Bayesians
Mayo, D. G. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107286184.017
What Ever Happened to Bayesian Foundations?
Mayo, D. G. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107286184.016
La compraventa en Proyecto de Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación de 2012
Borda, A. (2013) · Revista de responsabilidad civil y seguros: publicación mensual de doctrina, jurisprudencia y legislación
Crossley, N., 西原, 和., & 堀田, 裕. (2012) · 新泉社 eBooks
Critical thinking on the Samuelsonian Gospel according to John and David
McCLOSKEY, D. N. (2021) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220485.2021.2004280
Tigges, S. (2021) · Radiopaedia.org · doi:10.53347/rid-94529
González, J. A. (2021) · Medicina Clínica Práctica · doi:10.1016/j.mcpsp.2021.100298
Brain morphology, survival and patient-reported outcomes after cranial radiotherapy
Nagtegaal, S. (2021) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/939
Vinceti, S. R., & Filippini, T. (2021) · Public Health Toxicology · doi:10.18332/pht/144290
La controversia acerca del uso del p-valor en el mundo científico
Pérez-Ybarra, L., & Quintana-Rivero, W. (2021) · Salus · doi:10.54139/salus.v25i2.56
Sarno, M., dos Santos, L. C. B., Lyra, P. P. R., Mendes, C. M. C., de Oliveira, P. R., & Santiago, A. C. T. (2020) · Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal · doi:10.15406/ogij.2020.11.00520
van Witteloostuijn, A. C. (2021) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100198
Stop and Think About p-Value Statistics: Fisher, Neyman, and E. Pearson Revisited
MORIMOTO, R. (2021) · Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.4288/jafpos.30.0_43
Ziliak, S. T. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch · doi:10.3790/schm.140.3-4.229
Limited dynamic triggering in the Utah region, USA
Guenaga, D. L., Alfaro‐Diaz, R., & Velasco, A. A. (2022) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggac010
Walton, C. (2022) · Fields journal of Huddersfield student research · doi:10.5920/fields.988
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.015
Valle, L., & Kishan, A. U. (2021) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.010
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.006
Competing Accounts of Interference in Sentence Processing
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.012
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.003
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.004
Modelling Sentence Comprehension Deficits in Aphasia
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.013
An Extension of the Core Model: Modelling the Interaction of Eye-Movement Control and Parsing
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.010
Sorkin, J. D., MANARY, M. J., Smeets, P. A. M., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqab371
“In the American Statistical Association (ASA) Statement on Statistical Significance and P-Values (3), the ASA does not state that P values should be banned but rather that they should be used in proper context.”
BackgroundAn Extension of the Core Model: Modelling Prominence and Multi-associative Cues
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.009
Replication study design: confidence intervals and commentary
Kupper, L. L., & Martin, S. L. (2022) · Statistical Papers · doi:10.1007/s00362-022-01291-2
Someko, H., Tsujimoto, Y., & Anan, K. (2022) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10072-021-05848-1
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.014
Berry, K. J., Johnston, J. E., & Mielke, P. W. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98926-6_3
Dijkstra, H. A., Hernández-García, E., Masoller, C., & Barreiro, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316275757.010
Dijkstra, H. A., Hernández-García, E., Masoller, C., & Barreiro, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316275757.002
Williams, J. G., Moyle, P. B., Webb, J. A., & Kondolf, G. M. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119217374.refs · Cited by 2
Dijkstra, H. A., Hernández-García, E., Masoller, C., & Barreiro, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316275757.001
HEALTHCARE INTERVENTIONS FOR IMPROVING ACCESS
Serban, N. (2019) · doi:10.1002/9781119601340.ch5
Applications to Atmospheric Variability
Dijkstra, H. A., Hernández-García, E., Masoller, C., & Barreiro, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316275757.007
Climate Networks: Construction Methods and Analysis
Dijkstra, H. A., Hernández-García, E., Masoller, C., & Barreiro, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316275757.005
Applications to Oceanic Variability
Dijkstra, H. A., Hernández-García, E., Masoller, C., & Barreiro, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316275757.008
Clarke, B. R. (2018) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118669471.biblio
McCullough, B. D. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119689874.ref
Dijkstra, H. A., Hernández-García, E., Masoller, C., & Barreiro, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316275757.012
Paolella, M. S. (2018) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119417897.refs
Aitken, C. G. G., Taroni, F., & Bozza, S. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119245438.ref
Dijkstra, H. A., Hernández-García, E., Masoller, C., & Barreiro, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316275757.003
Rahaman, W. U., Khan, A. M., Anwer, A. H., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3982106
Alpha Seminar: A Course for New Graduate Students in Statistics
Bilder, C. R. (2022) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2022.2049366
Foster, D. R., & Sowinski, K. (2022) · Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1002/jac5.1613
Bergamaschi, R. C., & Tonelli, F. (2022) · Updates in Surgery · doi:10.1007/s13304-022-01260-2
Results Blind Science Publishing and a Decision-Theoretic Approach to Publishing
Locascio, J. J. (2022) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2022.2047048
“…on the state of NHST, five years after publication of the American Statistical Association’s cautionary statement on claimed misuse of p values (Wasserstein & Lazar, 2016) (Many researchers, e.g., David Trafimow, editor of Basic and Applied Social Psychology, who has banned use of NHST in his…”
BackgroundPark, H. Y., Suh, C. H., Shim, W. H., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1593346/v1
Statistical significance and clinical utility
Gilroy, L., Al‐Kouatly, H. B., & McLaren, R. A. (2022) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.059
Empirisch-quantitative Abschlussarbeiten – Ein Blick nach vorne
Lübke, K., & Krol, B. (2022) · FOM-Edition · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-35831-0_17
The Ways of Bayes (In Memory of Stephen Fienberg)
Louis, T. A. (2022) · Springer series in the data sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75460-0_5
Should we publish every correlation during the COVID-19 pandemic?Preprint
Florens, N., Meyerowitz‐Katz, G., Barrière, J., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zj4xr
Are the statistical tests the best way to deal with the biomarker selection problem?
Urkullu, A., Pérez, A., & Calvo, B. (2022) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-022-01677-6
“Any crisis brings changes, and, as many authors claim2 [29], it is time to rethink how scientific results are analyzed and interpreted.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialVojáček, J. (2022) · Intervenční a akutní kardiologie · doi:10.36290/kar.2022.017
(2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815823-4.09992-2
Howlett, D. C., Drinkwater, K. J., Frost, C. D., et al. (2017) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2017.03.012
Reviews of Books and Teaching Materials
Editors, T. (2016) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1234902
Bayesian evaluation of behavior change interventions: A brief introduction and a practical examplePreprint
Heino, M. T. J., Vuorre, M., & Hankonen, N. E. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xmgwv · Cited by 1
Demidenko, E. (2019) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119449195.biblio
Response to Letter to the Editor
Smith‐Roe, S. L., Shockley, K. R., Bucher, J. R., et al. (2019) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.22352
“In this respect, the central argument of the LTE aligns closely with the American Statistical Association Statement on p-values (Wasserstein and Lazar, 2016), a document that is well known in the statistical community and has been widely cited in the scientific literature.”
BackgroundP values, power, type I and type II errors
Campbell, M. J. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119402350.ch8
三輪, 哲. (2021) · Ouyou toukeigaku · doi:10.5023/jappstat.50.45
(2020) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.257.4.371
Basic Concepts for Statistical Modeling
Suarez, E. L., Pérez, C. M., Rivera, R., & Martínez, M. N. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119212515.ch1
(2019) · New Insights on Trust in Business-to-Business Relationships · doi:10.1108/s1069-096420190000026002
Williams, M., & Trist, D. G. (2019) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2019.11.001
Lepitzki, D. A. W. (2020) · The Canadian Field-Naturalist · doi:10.22621/cfn.v133i3.2479
Kerscher, M., & Weller, J. (2019) · SciPost Physics Lecture Notes · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.857
Levendis, J. D. (2018) · Springer texts in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98282-3_13
Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M., & Bartoszynski, R. (2021) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119243830.biblio
Vasishth, S., & Engelmann, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316459560.016
McNicholas, P. D. (2019) · FACETS · doi:10.1139/facets-2019-0005
Christensen, B., Christensen, S., & Missong, M. (2019) · WiWi klipp & klar · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27218-0_4
Chihara, L. M., & Hesterberg, T. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119505969.refs
Metadata
- Authors
- Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A.
- Affiliations
- American Statistical Association, 732 North Washington Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-1943
- American Statistical Association (US)
- ORCID
- Lazar, Nicole A.
- Venue
- The American Statistician
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-04-02
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-133
- ISSN
- 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2731
- OpenAlex
- W2293040502
- Semantic Scholar
- 81a65f23474ffceb2481836328608102950da979
- Cited by
- 6,306
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 625 · 2025: 629 · 2024: 575 · 2023: 543 · 2022: 642 · 2021: 676 · 2020: 678 · 2019: 666 · 2018: 596 · 2017: 438 · 2016: 226
- FWCI
- 649.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The American Statistician (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- p-values, statistical evidence, p-value interpretation, statistical inference, hypothesis testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
