CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 388Cultural Differences and ValuesChinese history and philosophyValues and Moral Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Harmony, Hierarchy and Conservatism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Confucian Values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan

Open access
Zhang, Yan Bing, Lin, Mei-Chen, Nonaka, Akihiko, Beom, Khisu·2005·Communication Research Reports
DOI 10.1080/00036810500130539
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined 1,631 college students’ endorsement of traditional Confucian values in four East Asian cultural contexts (i.e., China, Korea, Japan and Taiwan). Findings showed that young people endorsed values of interpersonal harmony the most, followed by the relational hierarchy and traditional conservatism respectively. Results also indicated that participants in China provided the highest ratings for interpersonal harmony and relational hierarchy among the four cultures. Finally, results demonstrated that Japanese females were more conservative than Japanese males and females in China and Taiwan. Results were discussed in the philosophical tradition of Confucianism, globalization and culture change in the East Asian cultures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00036810500130539

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yang KS, 1987, Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, [Academia Sinica (Taiwan)], 64, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–386 of 386

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y. B., Lin, M.-C., Nonaka, A., & Beom, K.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
ORCID
Venue
Communication Research Reports
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
107-115
ISSN
  • 0882-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-4099
DOI
10.1080/00036810500130539
OpenAlex
W2156641974
Cited by
388
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Communication Research Reports (publishedVersion)
  • KU ScholarWorks (University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
Keywords
Confucian values, interpersonal harmony, relational hierarchy, conservatism, cross-cultural comparison, East Asian culture, gender differences, globalization, cultural change, university students, China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review