The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Which panel data estimator should I use?
Abstract
This study employs Monte Carlo experiments to evaluate the performances of a number of common panel data estimators when serial correlation and cross-sectional dependence are both present. It focuses on fixed effects models with less than 100 cross-sectional units and between 10 and 25 time periods (such as are commonly employed in empirical growth studies). Estimator performance is compared on two dimensions: (i) root mean square error and (ii) accuracy of estimated confidence intervals. An innovation of our study is that our simulated panel data sets are designed to look like ‘real-world’ panel data. We find large differences in the performances of the respective estimators. Further, estimators that perform well on efficiency grounds may perform poorly when estimating confidence intervals and vice versa. Our experimental results form the basis for a set of estimator recommendations. These are applied to ‘out of sample’ simulated panel data sets and found to perform well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
Petersen, M. A. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn053 · Cited by 10,746
How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata
Roodman, D. (2009) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0900900106 · Cited by 9,848
Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data
Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465398557825 · Cited by 6,865
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
Kennedy, P. (1979) · Cited by 4,340
How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata
Roodman, D. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.982943 · Cited by 2,637
Testing for Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel-Data Models
De Hoyos, R. E., & Sarafidis, V. (2006) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0600600403 · Cited by 1,373
Parks, R. W. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482923 · Cited by 1,188
Diebold, F. X. (1997) · UCLA Biblioteca de Ingenieria Civil · Cited by 410
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1080/00036840500427973 · doi:10.1080/00036840500427973
- Greene, WH, 2003. Econometric Analysis, . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003.
- 10.1080/13504850500359510 · doi:10.1080/13504850500359510
- 10.1080/00036840500427163 · doi:10.1080/00036840500427163
- 10.1080/00036840500361214 · doi:10.1080/00036840500361214
- Wasylenko, M, 1997. Taxation and economic development: the state of the economic literature, New England Economic Review (1997), pp. 37–52.
Cited by
Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures
Yu, E. P.-Y., Luu, B. V., & Chen, C. H. (2020) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192 · Cited by 1,119
Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value
Yu, E. P., Guo, C. Q., & Luu, B. V. (2018) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2047 · Cited by 613
Drivers and barriers in the transition from a linear economy to a circular economy
Neves, S. A., & Marques, A. C. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130865 · Cited by 359
Khan, M. T. I., Yaseen, M. R., & Ali, Q. (2019) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2019.07.018 · Cited by 256
Impact of climate change on cereal production: evidence from lower-middle-income countries
Kumar, P., Sahu, N. C., Kumar, S., & Ansari, M. A. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14373-9 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, W. R., & Ye, H.
- Venue
- Applied Economics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-07-16
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 985-1000
- ISSN
- 0003-6846 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4283
- OpenAlex
- W2063207649
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 11.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- doi.org/10.1080/policies-text-data-mining (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Which panel data estimator should I use? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00036840802600087
- The paper
- Reed, W. R., & Ye, H. (2011). Which panel data estimator should I use? Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802600087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.