Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Which panel data estimator should I use?

Reed, W. Robert, Ye, Haichun·2011·Applied Economics

Abstract

This study employs Monte Carlo experiments to evaluate the performances of a number of common panel data estimators when serial correlation and cross-sectional dependence are both present. It focuses on fixed effects models with less than 100 cross-sectional units and between 10 and 25 time periods (such as are commonly employed in empirical growth studies). Estimator performance is compared on two dimensions: (i) root mean square error and (ii) accuracy of estimated confidence intervals. An innovation of our study is that our simulated panel data sets are designed to look like ‘real-world’ panel data. We find large differences in the performances of the respective estimators. Further, estimators that perform well on efficiency grounds may perform poorly when estimating confidence intervals and vice versa. Our experimental results form the basis for a set of estimator recommendations. These are applied to ‘out of sample’ simulated panel data sets and found to perform well.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00036840802600087

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1080/00036840500427973 · doi:10.1080/00036840500427973
  2. Greene, WH, 2003. Econometric Analysis, . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003.
  3. 10.1080/13504850500359510 · doi:10.1080/13504850500359510
  4. 10.1080/00036840500427163 · doi:10.1080/00036840500427163
  5. 10.1080/00036840500361214 · doi:10.1080/00036840500361214
  6. Wasylenko, M, 1997. Taxation and economic development: the state of the economic literature, New England Economic Review (1997), pp. 37–52.

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Reed, W. R., & Ye, H.
Venue
Applied Economics
Published
2009-07-16
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
985-1000
ISSN
  • 0003-6846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4283
OpenAlex
W2063207649
Cited by
440
References
14
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.org/10.1080/policies-text-data-mining (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Which panel data estimator should I use? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00036840802600087
The paper
Reed, W. R., & Ye, H. (2011). Which panel data estimator should I use? Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802600087

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.