The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public Participation in Planning: an intellectual history
Abstract
This paper tracks the changing role of public participation in planning thought. In doing so, the paper shows that the role of public participation in planning is largely determined by the nature of the planning enterprise being undertaken. The definition of the planning problem, the kinds of knowledge used in planning practice, and the conceptualisation of the planning and decision-making context are the important determinants of the extent of participation offered to the public. The paper therefore contributes to thinking about how to evaluate public participation by showing that it can only be understood in terms of the decision-making context in which it is embedded. Specifically, it makes little sense to evaluate public participation in terms that are not shared by the planning model itself
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity
Leiss, W., Beck, U., Ritter, M., Lash, S., & Wynne, B. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3341155 · Cited by 12,546
The Science of “Muddling Through”
Lindblom, C. E. (1959) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/973677 · Cited by 8,513
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy
Cooper, R. N., & Giddens, A. (1999) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20049222 · Cited by 3,170
Harvey, D. (2009) · University of Georgia Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book13205 · Cited by 3,069
The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy
Giddens, A. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,945
Carey, G. W., & Harvey, D. (1975) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/213551 · Cited by 1,941
Beyond left and right: the future of radical politics
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1182 · Cited by 1,841
Forester, J. (1982) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944368208976167 · Cited by 1,786
Cited by
Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities for Planning
Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013) · Journal of Planning Literature · doi:10.1177/0885412212469112 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Lane, M. B.
- Venue
- Australian Geographer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-299
- ISSN
- 0004-9182 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3311
- OpenAlex
- W2171823781
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public Participation in Planning: an intellectual history. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00049180500325694
- The paper
- Lane, M. B. (2005). Public Participation in Planning: an intellectual history. Australian Geographer. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
