The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attachment style and romantic love: Relationship dissolution
Abstract
The present research was designed to assess attachment style differences in subjects' reports of the dissolution of romantic relationships. One hundred and ninety-three unmarried undergraduates completed questionnaire measures of relationship history, including relationship dissolution and attachment style (both the forced-choice measure used by Hazan & Shaver, 1987; and a Likert-type version derived from that measure). Subjects were also followed up 10 weeks later in order to assess the stability of attachment style and its relation to the formation and dissolution of relationships. As expected, the three attachment styles differed strongly in their affective responses to dissolution. Measures of attachment style and mental models were also related to the occurrence of relationship termination; in particular, subjects endorsing the avoidant attachment style were the most likely to experience relationship break-up. Change in self-reported attachment style was associated with the formation of a steady relationship during the course of the study, but not with the experience of relationship break-up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247
Security in Infancy, Childhood, and Adulthood: A Move to the Level of Representation
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/3333827 · Cited by 4,567
Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644 · Cited by 3,678
Cited by
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132 · Cited by 1,601
Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples.
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1198 · Cited by 465
Davis, D., Shaver, P. R., & Vernon, M. L. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203029007006 · Cited by 408
The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001 · Cited by 382
Being Committed: Affective, Cognitive, and Conative Components of Relationship Commitment
Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201279011 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-08-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 69-74
- ISSN
- 0004-9530 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-9536
- OpenAlex
- W2079961945
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attachment style and romantic love: Relationship dissolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00049539208260145
- The paper
- Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1992). Attachment style and romantic love: Relationship dissolution. Australian Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539208260145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
