The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic
Abstract
1. A newly isolated Bacillus coagulans strain as probiotic was assayed as the only dietary additive for chickens. 2. Chickens receiving no additive at all or only virginiamycin were used for comparison. 3. Two trials each carried out on 75 chickens showed that, in terms of efficacy in growth and food conversion ratio, the B. coagulans biomass as a probiotic had a growth-promoting, prophylactic effect comparable to that of virginiamycin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., & Böhm, J. (2009) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00244 · Cited by 873
Mountzouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.2.309 · Cited by 632
Should Lactobacillus sporogenes and Bacillus coagulans Have a future?
Drago, L., & De Vecchi, E. (2009) · Journal of Chemotherapy · doi:10.1179/joc.2009.21.4.371 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- CAVAZZONI, V., ADAMI, A., & CASTROVILLI, C.
- Venue
- British Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 526-529
- ISSN
- 0007-1668 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-1799
- OpenAlex
- W2124294639
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00071669888719
- The paper
- CAVAZZONI, V., ADAMI, A., & CASTROVILLI, C. (1998). Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulans as probiotic. British Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669888719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
