Cited by 16Plant tissue culture and regenerationBanana Cultivation and ResearchChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Somaclonal variation in banana (Musa acuminate colla cv. Valery) regenerated plantlets from somatic embryogenesis: histological and cytogenetic approaches

Open access
Moradi, Zahra, Farahani, Farah, Sheidai, Masoud, Nejad Satari, Taher·2017·Caryologia

Abstract

Banana (Musa spp.) is the world’s fourth most important food crop after rice, wheat and maize. The Valery banana cultivar is imported in Iran and well known as economic bananas in southern Iran. Shoots (with 2–3 cm stems) of the “Valery” cultivar of banana (Musa sp.) were selected, and meristematic tissue explants were isolated and cultured. Following embryo development, germination and differentiation, samples of regenerated plantlets were randomly taken and fixed in Formaldehyde, Glycial Acetic Acid, Alchol Ethylic (FAA) solution. Serial sections (10 μm) were prepared and stained in hematoxiline and eosine. An aqueous solution of 8-hydroxyquinoline was used to pre-treat the root tips. A solution of absolute ethanol and glacial acetic acid was used to fix the root tips. The mitotic cells identified with metaphase or prometaphase stages were used for chromosome counting. The meristematic tissue segments became swollen two weeks after cultures were initiated. Calli of the embryogenic line were kept separately; these tissues released embryogenic cells. The highest number of embryos (globular, torpedo and mature) were obtained with embryogenic medium (BM). The mature embryos and regenerated plantlets were cultured on regenerated medium (GM). The percentage of germination and development of completely regenerated banana plants was 90–96%. Histological study of regenerated shoots showed that there were many vascular tissues but of a small size; also that the vascular bundles were large and dispersed. The chromosomes were aggregated in metaphase. The regenerated plants from somatic embryos showed 60% triploidy, 10% diploidy and 30% aneuploidy and the chromosomes are more contracted and spread around the cell.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00087114.2016.1198665

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro cultivation conditions affect mitotic stability, so variability in chromosome number and structure is more common in plant cell or tissue cultures than in the natural environment.

    “The in vitro cultivation conditions affect mitotic stability, thus the variability in chromosome number and structure is more common in plant cell or tissue cultures than in the natural environment [36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bakry F, Shepherd K. 2008. Chromosome count on banana root tip squashes. Fruits. 63(3):179-181. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1051/fruits:2008008. · DOI
  2. Becker DK, Dugdale B, Smith MK, Harding RM, Dale JL. 2000. Genetic transformation of Cavendish banana (Musa spp. AAA group) cv Grand Nain via microprojectile bombardment. Plant Cell Rep. 19(3):229-234. doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002990050004. · DOI
  3. Choy MK, Teoh SB. 2001. Mitotic instability in two wild species of bananas (Musa acuminata and M. balbisiana) and their common cultivars in Malaysia. Caryologia. 54(3):261-266. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2 001.10589234. · DOI
  4. Cote FX, Domergue R, Monmarson S, Schwendiman J, Teisson C, Escalant JV. 1996. Embryogenic cell suspensions from the male flower of Musa AAA cv. Grand nain. Physiol Plant. 97(2):285-290. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.970211.x. · DOI
  5. Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52(2):201-220. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223. 1964.tb01953.x. · DOI
  6. McGahan MW. 1961. Studies on the seed of banana. I. Anatomy of the seed and embryo of Musa balbisiana. Am J Bot. 48(3):230-238. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2439401. · DOI
  7. Meenakshi M, Shinde BN, Suprasanna P. 2011. Somatic embryogenesis from immature male flowers and molecular analysis of regenerated plants in banana, LAL KELA (AAA). J Fruit Ornamental Plant Res. 19(2):15-23.
  8. Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 15(3):473-497. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054. 1962.tb08052.x. · DOI
  9. Navarro C, Escobedo RM, Mayo A. 1997. In vitro plant regeneration from embryogenic cultures of a diploid and a triploid, Cavendish banana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 51(1):17-25. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023 /A:1005965030075. · DOI
  10. Okole BN, Schulz FA. 1996. Micro-cross sections of banana and plantains (Musa spp.): morphogenesis and regeneration of callus and shoot buds. Plant Science. 116(2):185-195. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(96)04381-6. · DOI
  11. Khalil SM, Cheah KT, Perez EM, Perez DA, Hu JS. 2002. Regeneration of banana (Musa spp. AAB cv. Dwarf Brazilian) via secondary somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep. 20(12):1128-1134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00299-002-0461-0. · DOI
  12. Stuessy TF. 1990. Plant Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
  13. Cote FX, Domergue R, Monmarson S, Schwendiman J, Teisson C, Escalant JV. 1996. Embryogenic cell suspensions from the male flower of Musa AAA CV. Grand nain. Physiol Plant. 97(2):285-290. doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.970211.x. · DOI
  14. Dole Zel J, Dole Zelva M, Van Den Houwe I, Roux N. 1998. A novel method to prepare slides for high resolution chromosome analysis in Musa. Infomusa. 7(1):3-4.
  15. Escalant JV, Teisson C, Cote FX. 1994. Amplified somatic embryogenesis from male flowers of triploid banana and plantain cultivars (Musa spp.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 30(4):181-186. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02823029. FAO. 2003. The World Banana Economy 1985-2002. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. · DOI
  16. Farahani F, Majd A. 2012. Comparison of liquid culture methods and effect of temporary immersion bioreactor on growth and multiplication of banana (Musa, cv. Dwarf Cavendish). Afr J Biotechnol. 11(33):8302-8308. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2020. · DOI
  17. Ganapathi TR, Higgs NS, Balint-Kurti PJ, Arntzen CJ, May GD, Van Eck JM. 2001. Agrobacterium?-mediated transformation of embryogenic cell suspensions of the banana cultivar Rasthali (AAB). Plant Cell Rep. 20(2): 157-162. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002990000287. · DOI
  18. Grapin A, Schwendiman J, Teisson C. 1996. Somatic embryogenesis in plantain banana. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 32(2):66-71. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02823133. · DOI
  19. Johansen DA. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  20. Kanchapoom K, Korapatchaikul K. 2012. Histology of callogenesis in diploid bananas (Musa acuminata, AA Group) 'Kluai Sa' and 'Kluai Leb Mu Nang' . Not Sci Biol. 4(1):94-97.
  21. Kauther SA, Elhassan AA, Ehiweris SO, Maki HE. 2013. Embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration via immature male flower culture of banana (Musa sp.) cv. Grand nain. Journal Forest Products & Industries. 2(3):48-52.
  22. Khalil SM, Elbanna AAM. 2004. Highly efficient somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration via suspension cultures of banana (Musa spp.). Arab. J Biotechnol. 7(1):99-110.
  23. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR. 1981. Somaclonal variation -a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet. 60(4):197-214. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02342540. · DOI
  24. Lee KS, Zapata-Arias FJ, Brunner H, Afza R. 1997. Histology of somatic embryo initiation and organogenesis from rhizome explants of Musa spp. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 51(1):1-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023 /A:1005985401756. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moradi, Z., Farahani, F., Sheidai, M., & Nejad Satari, T.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
  • Qom Islamic Azad University (IR)
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Department of Biology, School of Basic Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University (IAU), Tehran, Iran
Corresponding author
Farahani, Farah
Venue
Caryologia
Published
2016-11-07
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0008-7114 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-5391
OpenAlex
W2549265887
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Caryologia (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Islamic Azad University (123)
  • Islamic Azad University (IR) (456)
  • Shahid Beheshti University of biology Sciences (IR) (789)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Banana Cultivation and Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
banana, Musa acuminata, somaclonal variation, somatic embryogenesis, regenerated plants, chromosome number, triploidy, aneuploidy, chromosome morphology, embryo germination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review