Cited by 64Global trade, sustainability, and social impactRegional Development and InnovationGlobal Urban Networks and Dynamics

Lead Firms in the Cocoa–Chocolate Global Production Network: An Assessment of the Deductive Capabilities of GPN 2.0

Neilson, Jeff, Pritchard, Bill, Fold, Niels, Dwiartama, Angga·2018·Economic Geography

Abstract

Recent models of Global Production Network Theory (known as GPN 2.0) have attempted to theoretically explain the underlying determinants, or causal drivers, of particular industry network configurations, which in turn shape the territorial outcomes for regional development. To date, the ability of this ambitious conceptual model to thereby explain economic geography has remained largely untested beyond the select industry networks examined by its proponents, most notably the electronics, retail, and automotive sectors of East Asia. In this article, we stress test the causative model for the case of lead firms in the global cocoa–chocolate sector, and assess its ability to subsequently explain industry configurations and territorial outcomes in a particular country: Indonesia. Our application suggests that GPN 2.0 has considerable utility for directing empirical research, but challenges beset its fuller theoretical promise. We identify a problematic relationship between the deductive causality implied by GPN 2.0 and the inherent relationality of GPN 1.0 that remains, in our view, unresolved. As a result, we remain skeptical of the broader theoretical claims that GPN 2.0 possesses explanatory powers capable of deducing industry network configurations from a discrete set of supposedly independent variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00130095.2018.1426989

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contextual heterogeneity is important in shaping the influence of different network structures on lead firm behavior and relationships with suppliers and distributors.

    “Another study of chocolate GVCs in Indonesia by Neilson, Pritchard, Fold and Dwiartama (2018) also points to the importance of contextual heterogeneity in shaping the influence of different network structures on lead firm behavior and relationships with suppliers and distributors.”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Neilson, Pritchard, Fold and Dwiartama, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neilson, J., Pritchard, B., Fold, N., & Dwiartama, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Bandung Institute of Technology (ID)
Corresponding author
Neilson, Jeff
Venue
Economic Geography
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
400-424
ISSN
  • 0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8287
OpenAlex
W2801045903
Cited by
64
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economic Geography (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AGB-2010-099)
  • Sydney Southeast Asia Centre (G175885)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Development › Regional Development and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
Keywords
lead firms, global production networks, territorial development, economic geography theory, Indonesia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review