The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development
Abstract
This paper describes a qualitative approach to analysing students' concept maps. The classification highlights three major patterns which are referred to as 'spoke', 'chain' and 'net' structures. Examples are given from Year 8 science classes. The patterns are interpreted as being indicators of progressive levels of understanding. It is proposed that identification of these differences may help the classroom teacher to focus teaching for more effective learning and may be used as a basis for structuring groups in collaborative settings. This approach to analysing concept maps is of value because it suggests teaching approaches that help students integrate new knowledge and build upon their existing naive concepts. We also refer to the teacher's scheme of work and to the National Curriculum for science in order to consider their influence in the construction of understanding. These ideas have been deliberately offered for early publication to encourage debate and generate feedback. Further work is in progress to better understand how students with different conceptual structures can be most appropriately helped to achieve learning development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173469 · Cited by 5,199
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education
Novak, J. D. (1990) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660271003 · Cited by 1,032
Cited by
Stull, A. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808 · Cited by 295
Bowker, R., & Tearle, P. (2007) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-007-9025-0 · Cited by 131
Instructional Utility and Learning Efficacy of Common Active Learning Strategies
McConnell, D. A., Chapman, L., Czajka, C. D., Jones, J. P., Ryker, K. D., & Wiggen, J. (2017) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.5408/17-249.1 · Cited by 113
Bressington, D. T., Wong, W.-K., Lam, K. K. C., & Chien, W. T. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.019 · Cited by 105
How is the body's systemic nature manifested amongst high school biology students?
Tripto, J., Assaraf, O. B. Z., Snapir, Z., & Amit, M. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9390-0 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A.
- Venue
- Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-57
- ISSN
- 0013-1881 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2000830595
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 42.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.