Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What can evidence-use in practice learn from evidence-use in policy?

Rickinson, Mark, de Bruin, Kate, Walsh, Lucas, Hall, Matthew·2017·Educational Research

Abstract

Background: This paper approaches evidence-informed practice from the perspective of evidence-informed policy-making. Using the findings of a recent study of evidence-use by educational policy-makers to raise questions about evidence-use by educational practitioners, it seeks to explore what such a study might tell us about how to understand and improve evidence-use by educational practitioners.Purpose: The paper aims, therefore, to identify potential connections, shared insights and common issues between evidence-use in policy and evidence-use in practice. It does this by focusing on two specific areas: the nature of the evidence (i.e. what evidence is used) and the nature of the use (i.e. how evidence is used). The paper outlines what was found about each of these aspects of evidence-use in policy, and then considers what questions and issues these findings might raise for evidence-use in educational practice.Sample: The empirical study on which this paper is based was an in-depth study of the use of evidence within educational policy development in Australia. It focused on the development of three specific education policies within one Australian state education department and involved interviews with 25 policy-makers who were actively involved in the development of these policies.Design and methods: The policy-based study involved the following data collection processes: (i) in-depth semi-structured interviews with 25 policy-makers who were involved in the development of…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00131881.2017.1304306

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bell M., 2010, Report of Professional Practitioner Use of Research Review: Practitioner Engagement in and/or with Research
  2. 10.1080/13664530400200224 · doi:10.1080/13664530400200224
  3. 10.1111/bjep.1993.63.issue-3 · doi:10.1111/bjep.1993.63.issue-3
  4. Edwards M., 2011, Getting Evidence into Policy-Making. ANZSIG Insight Report
  5. Edwards A., 2016, Working Relationally in and across Practices: Cultural-Historical Approaches to Collaboration, 229
  6. Figgis J., 2000, DETYA the Impact of Educational Research
  7. Finnigan K. S., 2015, Leading the Use of Research and Evidence in Schools, 137
  8. NCSL (National College for School Leadership), 2012, Powerful Professional Learning: A School Leader’s Guide to Joint Practice Development
  9. Oliver K., 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems, 12, 1
  10. Penuel W. R., 2016, Findings from a National Survey of Research Use among School and District Leaders (Technical Report No. 1)
  11. Rickinson M., 2005, Practitioners’ Use of Research
  12. Rickinson M., 2003, Connecting Research and Practice: Education for Sustainable Development
  13. Rickinson M., 2016, The Use of Evidence in Educational Policy: A Pilot Study in Victoria
  14. Tooley J., 1998, Educational Research: A Critique. A Survey of Educational Research
  15. Tseng V., 2012, Sharing Child and Youth Development Knowledge, 26, 1
  16. 10.1007/978-3-319-04690-7 · DOI
  17. VERBI Software, 2015, MAXQDA, Software for Qualitative Data Analysis

Metadata

Authors
Rickinson, M., de Bruin, K., Walsh, L., & Hall, M.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Research Office, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
Venue
Educational Research
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
173-189
ISSN
  • 0013-1881
  • 1469-5847
Cited by
25
References
35
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What can evidence-use in practice learn from evidence-use in policy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00131881.2017.1304306
The paper
Rickinson, M., de Bruin, K., Walsh, L., & Hall, M. (2017). What can evidence-use in practice learn from evidence-use in policy? Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2017.1304306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.