Cited by 599Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyErgonomics and Human FactorsAerospace Engineering and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flight-deck automation: promises and problems

Open access

WIENER, EARL L., CURRY, RENWICK E.·1980·Ergonomics

DOI 10.1080/00140138008924809

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Modern microprocessor technology and display systems make it entirely feasible to automate many of the flight-deck functions previously performed manually. There are many benefits to be derived from automation; the question today is not whether a function can be automated, but whether it should be, due to various human factors issues. It is highly questionable whether total system safety is always enhanced by allocating functions to automatic devices rather than human operators, and there is some reason to believe that flight-deck automation may have already passed its optimum point. This is an age-old question in the human factors profession, and there are few guidelines available to the system designer. This paper presents the state-of-the-art in human factors in flight-deck automation, identifies a number of critical problem areas, and offers broad design guidelines. Some automation-related aircraft accidents and incidents are discussed as examples of human factors problems in automated flight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140138008924809

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Monitoring Behavior and Supervisory Control
Sheridan, T. B., & Johannsen, G. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2523-9 · Cited by 479
The human operator in process control
Mohler, R. R. (1975) · Annals of Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/0306-4549(75)90121-8 · Cited by 271
Controlled Flight into Terrain Accidents: System-Induced Errors
Wiener, E. L. (1977) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872087701900207 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Human Error in ATC System Operations
Danaher, J. W. (1980) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088002200503 · Cited by 82
Monitoring behaviour and supervisory control
(1975) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(75)80022-8 · Cited by 32
Midair Collisions: The Accidents, the Systems, and the Realpolitik
Wiener, E. L. (1980) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088002200502 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Automation in civil transport aircraft
Edwards, E. (1977) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(77)90163-6 · Cited by 26
Ergonomics and air safety
Rolfe, J. M. (1972) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(72)90056-7 · Cited by 17
Preview of Man-Vehicle Control Session
Johannsen, G. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2523-9_1 · Cited by 13
The instrument explosion — a study of aircraft cockpit instruments
Lovesey, E. J. (1977) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(77)90113-2 · Cited by 11

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

BOULANGER A., 1975, Proceedings of the Technical Conference, International Air Transport Association
COVEY R. R., 1979, Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Conference on Decision and Control
CURRY R.E., 1979, Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Conference on Decision and Control
EDWARDS , E. ,LEES, F. P. (editors) , 1974 , |ctThe Human Operator in Process Control|bt ( London TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD ).
FEAZEL M., 1980, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 113, 31
JOHANNSEN G., 1976, Monitoring Behavior and Supervisory Control
McLucus J. L., 1978, A irline Pilot, 47, 6
NAISH J. M., 1969, Shell Aviation News, 374, 2
O'LONE R. G., 1980, Aviation Week ami Space Technology, 113, 23
POTTER R., 1980, San Jose (California) Mercury
RANDLE R. J., 1980, NASA Publication 1055
ROPELEWSKI R. R., 1979, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 112, 46
JOHN ST., 1968, Shell Aviation News, 364, 2

Sorted by citations

Items 501–599 of 599

On-Board Flight Path Planning as a New Job Concept for Pilots
Sundermeyer, P., & Haack-Vörsmann, L. (1982) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)62906-9 · Cited by 1
Human factors evaluation of teletherapy: Literature review. Volume 5
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, W., Henriksen, K., Nuclear Regulatory Commission, W., Kaye, R., Jones, R., Morisseau, D. S., & Serig, D. I. (1995) · doi:10.2172/93989 · Cited by 1
Automated Corporate Cockpits: Some Observations
Wise, J. A., Guide, P. C., & Abbott, D. W. (1993) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129303700103 · Cited by 1
Supervisory control: Air traffic control specialist performance in shared versus traded states
Jara, D., & Corker, K. (2003) · IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) · doi:10.1109/dasc.2002.1067914 · Cited by 1
Improving Space Shuttle Safety Margin by Enhancing the Caution & Warning System Design
Brown, E. (2003) · AIAA SPACE Conference & Exposition · doi:10.2514/6.2003-6386 · Cited by 1
Emerging areas: urban operations and UCAVs: human effectiveness issues in simulated uninhabited combat aerial vehicles
Prabhala, S., Gallimore, J. J., & Narayanan, S. (2003) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.5555/1030818.1030955 · Cited by 1
A Comparison of AH-64 Pilot Attitudes Toward Traditional and Glass Cockpit Crewstation Designs
Francis, G., Rash, C. E., LeDuc, P. A., Adam, G. E., & Archie, S. L. (2002) · doi:10.21236/ada405652 · Cited by 1
Have we overlooked the pilot's role in an automated flight deck
Steinmetz, G. G., PERSON, L., & Morello, S. A. (1981) · IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) · doi:10.2514/6.1981-2262 · Cited by 1
Investigation of error rates when controlling multiple uninhabited combat aerial vehicles
Prabhala, S., & Gailimore, J. (2004) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.5555/1161734.1161922 · Cited by 1
How a cognitive tutor can improve pilot knowledge of mode transitions
Javaux, D., & Sherry, L. (2003) · IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) · doi:10.1109/dasc.1999.863727 · Cited by 1
Effects of Information Source, Pedigree and Reliability on Operators' Utilization of Decision Support Systems
Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2005) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
Situational Emergency Training: Experiences and Implications
Lucaccini, L. F., & Freedy, A. (1982) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/821429 · Cited by 1
Common Shortcomings in Software for Autonomous Systems
Hammer, J. M., & Singletary, B. (2004) · AIAA Intelligent Systems Technical Conference · doi:10.2514/6.2004-6554 · Cited by 1
Perceptions of Personality in Computer Agents: Effects of Culture and Gender
Prabhala, S., & Gallimore, J. J. (2005) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120504900517 · Cited by 1
“Though the introduction of automation may improve overall performance by reducing workload and human error, it also brings new problems such as trust biases, complacency, vigilance decrements, skill degradation, and loss of awareness to name a few (Wiener and Curry, 1980).”
Background
Function Allocation between Human and Automation and Between Air and Ground
Feigh, K. M., & Pritchett, A. R. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470686652.eae1128 · Cited by 1
Performance, trust, and workload in an automation-aided visual search task
Monfort, S. S. (2017) · doi:10.13021/mars/6545 · Cited by 1
A User-Centric Approach to Improve the Quality of UML-like Modelling Tools and Reduce the Efforts of Modelling
Pourali, P. (2020) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 1
Towards Design-Induced Error Tolerance
Speyer, J.-J. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0981-6_13 · Cited by 1
Change in Human (Moral) Decision-Making and Performance with Automation: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Human-Automation InteractionPreprint
Prével, A., & Bue, S. L. (2022) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202203.0070.v1 · Cited by 1
Investigation of Error Rates When Controlling Multiple Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles
Prabhala, S., & Gallimore, J. J. (2005) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc.2004.1371423 · Cited by 1
“Wiener and Curry (1980) reported that the advent of automation brings new problems associated with human computer interaction (HCI).”
Background
Attention management to improve fallback-readiness in conditional automated vehicles
Gerber, M. A. (2023) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.239712
Crew aiding and automation: A system concept for terminal area operations, and guidelines for automation design
Dwyer, J. P. (1994) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 1
Retrieving vehicle control after automation: A comparison between two methods to measure situation awareness
Hueting, T. F. (2013)
Estimating the Expected Effectiveness of Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning Systems in Reducing Controlled Flight Into Terrain by Aircraft Operating under Part-135
Mortimer, R. G., & von Thaden, T. L. (2000) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2000-01-2105
Differences in general and commercial aviation automation
Hitt, J. M., & Jentsch, F. G. (2003) · IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) · doi:10.1109/dasc.1999.863719
Automated decision aids in future air traffic management: human performance and mental workload
Metzger, U. (2001)
Tool for Rapid Advanced Cockpit Simulation (TRACS) for Next Generation Human Space Vehicles
Blaser, B., Crum, R., Sogard, J., & Williams, K. (2004) · AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference · doi:10.2514/6.2004-4927
Interactive multimodal path planning in immersion
Cailhol, S., Fillatreau, P., & Fourquet, J.-Y. (2013) · IEEE International Workshop of Electronics, Control, Measurement, Signals and their Application to Mechatronics (ECMSM) · doi:10.1109/ecmsm.2013.6648954
“These problems were first noticed in aviation by Wiener [11] but later also in all industrial processes by Bainbridge [12].”
Background
Book review of Cockpit Monitoring and Alerting Systems
Parasuraman, R. (1995) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0504_4
Design of a Cockpit Display Panel for Tactical Aircraft Operating with Coupled Vertical Navigation (VNAV)
Boone, A., Field, B., & Feigh, K. M. (2009) · AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO) · doi:10.2514/6.2009-7065
A Comparison of Operator Performance in Manual and Automated Versions of a Dynamic Decision-making Task
Wickens, C. D., Yeh, Y., Fuld, R. B., & Hodel, S. (1985) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193128502901202
The Verification of Pilot Abilities as a Basis for Validating Flight Crew Competency
Hunt, G. J. F. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02933-6_49
Individual Differences in the Performance of a Process Control Task
Huey, B. M., & Boehm‐Davis, D. A. (1992) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1518/107118192786750322
“However, research suggests that this is a poor overall design for human-machine control of complex processes (Wiener and Curry, 1980).”
Background
The Efficiency of New Audio Alerts in the COOPANS Eurocat System
Kearney, P., & Li, W. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20373-7_38
Characteristics of optimal interactive man-robot systems
Zakay, D. (2005) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2004.1374751
Discussion Panel Human Factors in Everyday Life
Sethumadhavan, A., McLaughlin, A. C., Nichols, T., Pak, R., & Smith, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213571094
“While a car that drives on its own has the obvious advantage of reducing accidents caused due to driver distraction, it has the potential to leave the driver out of the loop (e.g., Wiener & Curry, 1980).”
Background
Whatis it doing now? Results of a Survey into A utomation Surprise 1
Hurts, K., & de Boer, R. J. (2014)
Training for Automatics
Norman, R. (1982) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/821414
Winging It in the 1980's: Why Guidelines are Needed for Cockpit Automation
Hoagland, M. R. (1984) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/841634
Development of an Initial Model of Human-Automatio
Oxstrand, J., O'Hara, J., Joe, J. C., & Kat (2013) · doi:10.2172/1084681 · Cited by 4
“…is that the interfaces between operators and automation are poorly designed (Billings, 1997a, 1997b; Endsley, 1996; Funk & Lyall, 2000; Hollnagel, 1999; Lyall & Funk, 1998; Parasuraman, Sheridan, & Wickens, 2000; Parasuraman & Riley, 1997; Thurman, Brann, & Mitchell, 1977; Wiener & Curry, 1980).”
Workload and Automation
Speyer, J.-J., & Blomberg, R. D. (1989) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/892614
A Systems-Based Approach to Functional Decomposition and Allocation for Developing UAS Separation Assurance Concepts
Lee, S. M., & Mueller, E. R. (2013) · Cited by 1
Datorbaserat kontrollrum inom processindustrin : erfarenheter i ett tidsperspektiv
Holmgren, M. (1997)
Improvement of Perception and Cognition in Synthetic Spatial Environments
Maschinenbau, V. F. (2000)
Clustering Algorithm for Large-Scale Flight Data Analysis of Cockpit Human Machine Interaction Issues
Vaidya, A., Lee, S., & Hwang, I. (2016) · AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO) · doi:10.2514/6.2016-4077
Electronic Checklists on Multi-Purpose Displays: A Better Way For Fighter Pilots to Manage Information and Situational Awareness during Periods of High Workload
Doherty, P. (2001) · doi:10.21236/ada391893
Stoic Behavior Hypothesis in Hint Seeking and Development of Reversi Learning Environment as Work Bench for Investigation.
Miwa, K., Kojima, K., & Terai, H. (2014) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
Aiding the Pilot in Flight Control Fault Detection
Chiecchio, J. J. A. (2005) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)
Investigation of design and implementation guidance for computerized procedures and associated automation
Yang, C., Yenn, T., Cheng, T.-C., Chen, M., Wu, T.-M., & Lin, C. J. (2010) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b10529-84
Phileas simulatoronderzoek: gedrag en evaluatie chauffeurs
de Waard, D., Brookhuis, K., & van Wolffelaar, P. C. (2003) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
The analysis of incidents related to automation failures and human factors in flight operations
Li, W., Durando, D., & Ting, L.-Y. (2014) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16742-67
Seeing the Big Picture: Pilot Assessments of Cockpit System Interactions Contribution to Situation Awareness
Meyer, D. R., Rusnock, C. F., & Miller, M. E. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40030-3_41
Techniques For Improving Pilot Recovery From System Failures
Va, H. (2014) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)
The Use Of Investigation Models To Explain Accident Causation And Operator Performance
Strauch, B. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591277
“In the former, investigators relied on research such as operator reliance on automation (Weiner and Curry, 1980), vigilance and automation (Young, 1969), and automation effects on operator transition to manual control (Boehm-Davis, Curry, Weiner, and Harrison, 1981).”
Method
Individual Preferences In The Use Of Automation
Thropp, J. E. (2006) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
PRELIMINARY IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS CAUSING PILOTS TO DISCONNECT THE FLIGHT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN GLASS COCKPITS
Galante, G. T. (1995) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Objectively Defining Scenario Complexity: Towards Automated, Adaptive Scenario-Based Training
Dunn, R. (2014) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Workload and the En Route Controller – An Overblown Issue?
Rohde, R. W. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_11
Consumers' Level of Trust in Using an Automated Train, Aircraft, or Vehicle as a Transportation Means
Patin, V. A. (2017)
Exploring Automated Trading: Modeling a Financial System with a Variable Degree of Automation, Display Design, and Evaluation
Li, Y. (2017) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.32322.89287
A Comparison of AH-64D and OH-58D Pilot Attitudes Toward Glass Cockpit Crewstation Designs
Francis, G., Rash, C. E., Adam, G. E., LeDue, P. A., & Archie, S. L. (2002) · doi:10.21236/ada408934
Automation
Swan, J. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100587-3.00009-9
ON-BOARD FLIGHT PATH PLANNING AS A NEW JOB CONCEPT FOR PILOTS
Sundermeyer, P., & Haack-Vörsmann, L. (1983) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-029348-6.50035-x
The Advanced Technology Crew Station: Development and Validation of a Workload Assessment Technique for Cockpit Function Allocation
Glenn, F. A., Boardway, J., Wherry, R. J., Cohen, D., & Carmody, M. A. (1993) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
COMPORTAMENTO HUMANO E OS PRIMEIROS ANOS DA AUTOMAÇÃO NA AVIAÇÃO COMERCIAL: RELEMBRANDO O ACIDENTE DO VOO AA965 / HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND THE EARLY YEARS OF COMMERCIAL AVIATION AUTOMATION: REMEMBERING THE ACCIDENT OF FLIGHT AA965
Vaz, C. A. (2021) · Brazilian Journal of Development · doi:10.34117/bjdv7n2-567
Cognitive factor forming an individual constituent in a driver model inferred from multiplicatory relationships between cognitive sub-factorsPreprint
Lethaus, F., & Kaul, R. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.06397
“…to human performance, and usually becomes noticeable when it fails in operation or does not accomplish the desired outcome (Fitts, 1951; Wickens & Kessel, 1979; Wickens & Kessel, 1980; Wiener & Curry, 1980; Rasmussen & Rouse, 1981; Wickens & Kessel, 1981; Wickens et al., 1998; Sheridan, 2002).”
Background
Decision Making in Preflight Operations : A study of memory supports and feedback
Enflo, K. (2008) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
References
(2003) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203485088.bmatt
References
(2011) · doi:10.1201/b11371-21
Front Matter
(2011) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315252988-1
References, Part 10
(2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-075067555-0.50158-4
SURVIVAL STRATEGIES OF MALAYSIAN SHIPPING INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: APPROACH TO DIGITALISATION AND AUTOMATION
Zainudin, M. N. F., & Rozar, N. M. (2022) · JOURNAL OF MARITIME LOGISTICS · doi:10.46754/jml.2021.12.006
“Improved capability and efficiency, decreased manual workload and exhaustion, efficient usage of machinery, more precise management of repetitive procedures, and reduced gaps in human abilities are some advantages of automation highlighted by Wiener and Curry (1980) and Balfe et al. (2015).”
Background
Human factors evaluation of conflict resolution aid in future air traffic control
Trapsilawati, F. (2017) · doi:10.32657/10356/71503
Einführung
Kraiss, K. (1985) · Fachberichte messen, steuern, regeln · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-07178-6_1
15 Automation
Strauch, B. (2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315589749-16
Validation of a Limited Information Shared Controller: A Comparative Study
Varga, B., Rothfuß, S., & Hohmann, S. (2022) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc53654.2022.9945512
“in automotive [16], semi-auto pilots of planes [17], wheel chairs [18].”
Background
Human–Autonomous System Interface and Decision-Making
Kim, J., Lee, S., & Seong, P. H. (2023) · Lecture notes in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22386-0_8
Kompetenzerhalt für Nicht-Routine-Situationen an hochautomatisierten Arbeitsplätzen der chemischen und pharmazeutischen Produktion
Conein, S., & Felkl, T. (2023) · Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s41449-023-00359-5
Non-Driving-Related Tasks Influencing Drivers’ Takeover Time: A Meta-AnalysisPreprint
Hu, W., Zhang, T., Zhang, Y., & Chan, A. H. S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4658356
WITHDRAWNPreprint
Mbelekani, N. Y. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rtuy5
Causes of Failure
Kwik, J. (2024) · T.M.C. Asser Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-631-4_5
Intention when humans team with AI
Quandt, R. P. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29246-0.00012-2
Human-Machine Interface Design of Flying Cars in Unmanned Driving Scenarios
Li, Z., Deng, H., & Yuan, Q. (2025) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1908-8_1
Gestaltung resilienter Verkehrssysteme: Funktionale Musteranalyse von Mensch–Automation-Interaktionen im Mischverkehr
Grabbe, N. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s41449-025-00495-0
GenAI as complete cognitive automation for untrained users at population scale: implications for human factors and ergonomics
Pak, R., Rovira, E. M., & McLaughlin, A. C. (2026) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2026.2686284 · Cited by 2
Kognitive Anforderungen bei der Fahrzeug- und Prozeßführung
Kraiss, K. (1985) · Fachberichte messen, steuern, regeln · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-07178-6_2
Towards a characterization of information automation systems on the flight deck
Dudley, R. (2014) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-3694
“The lower the cost, the better the plan.”
Background
Design validation of multi-mode systems
Sprinkle, J. M., & Chu, D. (2013)
La priorisation humaine. Étude des corrélats cognitifs de l'évaluation des priorités
Valéry, B. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/07d94122z3a93z473dz878fz84be35bcb332
Automatisation de l'information et fiabilité : effets sur le comportement humain
Avril, E. (2020) · doi:10.70675/7de946c3z8f7ez44ddz853fz648da1caf7ed
Human-robotic performance quantification under time-delay for lunar mission control scenarios
Hosseini, S. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/b2909fc8z669bz431cz9c63z713cc55feb79
Decoding Automation Narratives in Heritage Education and Tourism: A Google Trends Inquiry into Optimization Dynamics
Irfan, M., Singh, K. A., Gochhait, S., & Allam, Z. (2025) · International Conference on Sustaining Heritage (ICSH) · doi:10.1109/icsh68040.2025.11548170
Insights from a Simulator Study: How the Intelligent Pilot Advisory System (IPAS) Could Impact Decision-Making in Flight Operations
Würfel, J., & Lenting, R. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29459-3_21
Human roles in the era of intelligent surgery
Kuo, M. C., & Kuo, P. C. (2026) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.117158
Towards Human Factors Evaluation of Interactions with Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships Using Full Mission Bridge Simulators: The Conventional Officer’s Perspective
Maes, P., McMahon, E. R., Jirak, D., Rooy, D. V., Jacobs, W., Schaeren, R. V., van Hassel, E., & Verwulgen, S. (2026) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse14161533
“Previous research in flight deck automation already suggested that the use of automation can also contribute to accidents and has limits [15].”
Certification for civil flight decks and the human-computer interface
McClumpha, A., & Rudisill, M. (1994) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)
Transport Aircraft Crew Workload Assessment-Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?
Sandry, D. L., Boucek, G. P., Logan, A. L., Biferno, M. A., & Corwin, W. H. (1987) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/871769
Untitled work
(1992) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 141
Untitled work
(1999) · doi:10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4

Authors: WIENER, E. L., & CURRY, R. E.
Affiliations: University of Miami (US)
Venue: Ergonomics
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 1980-11
Volume: 23
Issue: 10
Pages: 995-1011
ISSN: 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
1366-5847
DOI: 10.1080/00140138008924809
OpenAlex: W2153220708
Cited by: 599
References: 21
Citations by year: 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 14
FWCI: 10.42
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
hdl.handle.net
Locations: Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Ames Research Center
Topics: Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Human Factors
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Keywords: cockpit automation, human factors, aircraft automation, human-automation interaction, system safety, aviation accidents, pilot workload, microprocessor technology, display devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Flight-deck automation: promises and problems

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks