Cited by 88EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyTactile and Sensory Interactions

A covert attention P300-based brain–computer interface: Geospell

Aloise, Fabio, Aricò, Pietro, Schettini, Francesca, Riccio, Angela, Salinari, Serenella, Mattia, Donatella, Babiloni, Fabio, Cincotti, Febo·2012·Ergonomics

Abstract

The Farwell and Donchin P300 speller interface is one of the most widely used brain-computer interface (BCI) paradigms for writing text. Recent studies have shown that the recognition accuracy of the P300 speller decreases significantly when eye movement is impaired. This report introduces the GeoSpell interface (Geometric Speller), which implements a stimulation framework for a P300-based BCI that has been optimised for operation in covert visual attention. We compared the Geospell with the P300 speller interface under overt attention conditions with regard to effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction. Ten healthy subjects participated in the study. The performance of the GeoSpell interface in covert attention was comparable with that of the P300 speller in overt attention. As expected, the effectiveness of the spelling decreased with the new interface in covert attention. The NASA task load index (TLX) for workload assessment did not differ significantly between the two modalities. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: This study introduces and evaluates a gaze-independent, P300-based brain-computer interface, the efficacy and user satisfaction of which were comparable with those off the classical P300 speller. Despite a decrease in effectiveness due to the use of covert attention, the performance of the GeoSpell far exceeded the threshold of accuracy with regard to effective spelling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140139.2012.661084

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effectiveness of covert attention P300 BCI is lower than BCI based on overt attention P300.

    “Although its effectiveness is lower than BCI based on overt attention P300 [87].”
  • The differences between overt attention P300 and covert attention P300 have been found in [87].

    “These differences between overt attention P300 and covert attention P300 have been found in [87].”
  • The contribution of the VEP to the classification stage using covert attention P300 based interface was significantly lower compared with using overt attention P300 based interface, as reported in [87].

    “This finding supports results previously reported in [87], where they found that the contribution of the VEP to the classification stage using covert attention P300 based interface was significantly lower compared with using overt attention P300 based interface.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aloise, F., Aricò, P., Schettini, F., Riccio, A., Salinari, S., Mattia, D., Babiloni, F., & Cincotti, F.
Affiliations
  • a Neuroelectrical Imaging and BCI Lab, Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS , Rome , Italy
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
Ergonomics
Published
2012-03-29
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
538-551
ISSN
  • 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5847
OpenAlex
W2083953935
Cited by
88
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
P300 speller, covert visual attention, brain-computer interface, user satisfaction, workload, NASA-TLX
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Software, User-Computer Interface, Writing, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review