Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Fluid Dispossessions’: Contested Waters in Capitalist Natures

Dewan, Camelia, Nustad, Knut G.·2024·Ethnos
DOI 10.1080/00141844.2023.2214340
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This special issue on ‘“Fluid Dispossessions’: Contested Waters in Capitalist Natures” examines the multiple and mutable relationships between water, dispossession and property. We use ‘fluid dispossessions’ as an analytical prompt to examine the different ways in which water’s biophysical properties, its material fluidity and movements (and the more-than-human species that move with it), shape processes of capitalist extraction, accumulation and dispossession. Fluid dispossessions go beyond the power politics of controlling water as a resource to include indirect and more-than-economic forms of dispossession. By analysing emic understandings of dispossession, we draw on ‘fluid dispossessions’ to reject binary categorisations of liquid:solid in order to reveal the diversity of ways capitalist extractive activities may disrupt existing affective, ecological, or spiritual relations with water. This can cause more-than-economic forms of dispossession such as the loss of social reproduction, emotional distress, loss of health, the rupturing of multispecies relations and local care practices of waterscapes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00141844.2023.2214340

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dupuits, Emilie & Maria Mancilla Garcia. 2016. Introduction to the Special Issue on “Water and (Neo)Extractivism in Latin America”. Alternautas: (Re)Searching Development: The Abya Yala Chapter, 3(2):4–11.
  2. Nustad, K. G., D. Brown & H. Swanson. 2023, this issue. Hatching Conflicts: Trout Reproduction, Aquatic Conditions, and Property Ownership in South Africa. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, ‘Fluid Dispossessions’: Contested Waters in Capitalist Natures.
  3. Simon, S. 2023, this issue. The Art of Gleaning and Not Getting Domesticated. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, ‘Fluid Dispossessions’: Contested Waters in Capitalist Natures.

Cited by

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Dewan, C., & Nustad, K. G.
Affiliations
Department of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
ORCID
Venue
Ethnos
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2023-07-11
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
389-400
ISSN
  • 0014-1844
  • 1469-588X
DOI
10.1080/00141844.2023.2214340
Cited by
19
References
62
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (Global Trout (287438))

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.