Cited by 284Water Governance and InfrastructureEnvironmental Science and Water ManagementWater Resource Management and Quality

Water: Political, biopolitical, material

Bakker, Karen·2012·Social Studies of Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0306312712441396

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bakker, K.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Bakker, Karen
Venue
Social Studies of Science
Published
2012-05-02
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
616-623
ISSN
  • 0036-8539 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-3127
  • 1460-3659
OpenAlex
W2328152736
Cited by
284
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
67.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Studies of Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental Science and Water Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
Keywords
water, water politics, biopolitics, materiality, water governance, environmental politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review