Cited by 99Pain Management and Placebo EffectPediatric Pain Management TechniquesDental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain:A Critical Review

Open access
Kendrick, Cassie, Sliwinski, Jim, Yu, Yimin, Johnson, Aimee, Fisher, William, Kekecs, Zoltán, Elkins, Gary·2016·International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Abstract

Clinical evidence for the effectiveness of hypnosis in the treatment of acute procedural pain was critically evaluated based on reports from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Results from the 29 RCTs meeting inclusion criteria suggest that hypnosis decreases pain compared to standard care and attention control groups and that it is at least as effective as comparable adjunct psychological or behavioral therapies. In addition, applying hypnosis in multiple sessions prior to the day of the procedure produced the highest percentage of significant results. Hypnosis was most effective in minor surgical procedures. However, interpretations are limited by considerable risk of bias. Further studies using minimally effective control conditions and systematic control of intervention dose and timing are required to strengthen conclusions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207144.2015.1099405

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hundreds of research trials and case studies investigating the effectiveness of hypnosis-based interventions for various symptoms and conditions have been published.

    “hundreds of research trials and case studies investigating the effectiveness of hypnosis-based interventions for the treatment of various symptoms and conditions have been published (for recent reviews, see e.g., Madden et al., 2016;Carlson, et al., 2018;Kendrick et al., 2016;Fisch et al., 2017;Catsaros & Wendland, 2020).”

    From Guidelines for the Assessment of Efficacy of Clinical Hypnosis Applications (2022) · cites this paper as Kendrick et al., 2016

  • Few of the studies in prior reviews measured opioid use, and those reviews included patients who were not prescribed opioids.

    “Few of the studies reviewed measured opioid use, and reviews included patients who were not prescribed opioids.”
  • Prior reviews demonstrate that mind-body therapies may be associated with significantly alleviated clinical pain.

    “Reviews [9][10][11][12][13][14] demonstrate that MBTs may be associated with significantly alleviated clinical pain.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Elkins GR 2014 Hypnotic Relaxation Therapy: Principles and Applications Washington, DC Springer 25928488
  2. Massarini M Rovetto F Tagliaferri C Leddi G Montecorboli U Orifiammi P Parvoli G 2005 Preoperative hypnosis. A controlled study to assess the effects on anxiety and pain in the postoperative period European Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 6 1 8 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendrick, C., Sliwinski, J., Yu, Y., Johnson, A., Fisher, W., Kekecs, Z., & Elkins, G.
Affiliations
Baylor University (US)
Corresponding author
Elkins, Gary
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Published
2015-11-24
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
75-115
ISSN
  • 0020-7144 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5183
OpenAlex
W2179151588
Cited by
99
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (U01AT004634)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Keywords
hypnosis, pain management, hypnotic analgesia, minor surgery, psychological intervention, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Humans, Hypnosis, Hypnosis, Anesthetic, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Acute Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review