CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Pain Management and Placebo EffectNeural dynamics and brain functionParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attention-related electroencephalographic and event-related potential predictors of responsiveness to suggested posthypnotic amnesia

Schnyer, David M., Allen, John J.·1995·International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
DOI 10.1080/00207149508409972
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Higher frequency electroencephalographic (EEG) activity around 40 Hz has been shown to play a role in cognitive functions such as attention. Furthermore, event-related brain potential (ERP) components such as N1 and P1 are sensitive to selective attention. In the present study, 40-Hz EEG measures and early ERP components were employed to relate selective attention to hypnotic response. Participants were 20 low hypnotizable individuals, half assigned as simulators, and 21 high hypnotizable individuals. Each of these groups was subsequently divided into two groups based on recognition amnesia scores. The four groups differed in 40-Hz (36-44 Hz) EEG spectral amplitude recorded during preinduction resting conditions but not in EEG amplitude postinduction. The groups also differed in N1 amplitudes recorded during hypnosis. Regression analysis revealed that these effects only distinguish the high hypnotizable participants who experienced recognition amnesia from all other groups. The findings support the role of selective attention in hypnotic responsiveness, and the utility of subdividing high hypnotizable individuals is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207149508409972

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have found higher regional areas of baseline gamma activity in highs relative to lows, and also an increase in gamma activity in response to hypnosis.

    “Some studies have found higher regional areas of baseline gamma activity in highs relative to lows (Akpinar, Ulett, & Itil, 1971; De Pascalis, 1993; Schnyer & Allen, 1995), and also an increase in gamma activity in response to hypnosis (De Pascalis, 1993).”

    From Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability (2015) · cites this paper as Schnyer & Allen, 1995

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Allen J. J., 1992, Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, O5B
  2. 10.1016/0006-3223(93)90104-L · DOI
  3. Allen J. J., Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
  4. Apkinar S., 1971, Biological Psychiatry, 3, 387
  5. 10.1080/00207149208409644 · DOI
  6. Barber T. X., 1969, Hypnosis: A scientific approach.
  7. 10.1007/BF00998560 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/h0031327 · DOI
  9. Carroll J. B., 1971, The American Heritage word frequency book.
  10. 10.1016/0278-2626(87)90118-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.915 · DOI
  12. Crawford H. J., 1989, Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research, 155, 10.1007/978-3-642-73875-3_11 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/00207149408409352 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0021-843X.102.4.534 · DOI
  15. Crawford H. J., 1992, Contemporary hypnosis research, 227
  16. 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90073-X · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/00207149408409340 · DOI
  18. de Pascalis V., 1984, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 371, 10.2466/pms.1984.59.2.371 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0167-8760(87)90003-1 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/00207149008414507 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0021-843X.99.4.336 · DOI
  22. Dixon M., 1992, Contemporary hypnosis research, 34
  23. 10.1007/BF00998595 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/00207148608406988 · DOI
  25. Fromm E., 1992, Contemporary hypnosis research, 131
  26. 10.1037/h0032959 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0013-4694(85)90005-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hilgard E. R., 1965, Hypnotic susceptibility.
  30. Hilgard E. R., 1977, Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action.
  31. 10.1126/science.182.4108.177 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.3336779 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90074-Y · DOI
  34. 10.1080/00207148408416000 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/00207147808411257 · DOI
  36. Krippner S.R., 1974, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 16, 166, 10.1080/00029157.1974.10403673 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.6623094 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb02313.x · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90229-1 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/h0046128 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Orne M. T., 1979, Hypnosis: Development in research and new perspectives, 519
  42. Pekala R. J., 1988, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 7, 303, 10.2190/EA8C-H3YY-81V4-VU8G · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb01989.x · DOI
  44. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.91 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/0167-8760(90)90027-B · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0301-0511(77)90028-X · DOI
  47. Sheer D. E., 1970, Molecular mechanisms in memory and learning, 177
  48. Sheer D. E., 1976, The neuropsychology of learning disorders, 71
  49. Sheer D. E., 1984, Self-regulation of the brain and behavior, 63
  50. Sheer D. E., 1989, Brain dynamics, 2, 339, 10.1007/978-3-642-74557-7_29 · DOI
  51. Shor R. E., 1962, Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
  52. Spiegel D., 1989, American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 749, 10.1176/ajp.146.6.749 · DOI
  53. 10.1037/0021-843X.94.3.249 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1982.tb02497.x · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb02160.x · DOI
  56. 10.1037/h0036681 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.3758/BF03206080 · DOI
  58. 10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.175 · DOI
  59. Weitzenhoffer A. M., 1962, Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
  60. Woods D. L., 1990, The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies. J.
  61. Event-related brain potentials: Basic issues and applications, 178–209. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schnyer, D. M., & Allen, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1995-07
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
295-315
ISSN
  • 0020-7144 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5183
DOI
10.1080/00207149508409972
OpenAlex
W1981619534
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH017069, 5T32-MH17069-07)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
hypnotic susceptibility, posthypnotic amnesia, selective attention, event-related potentials, N1 component, P1 component, hypnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Attention, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Male, Middle Aged, Mental Recall, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Suggestion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review