Student performance and attitudes in a collaborative and flipped linear algebra course
Abstract
Flipped learning is gaining traction in K-12 for enhancing students’ problem-solving skills at an early age; however, there is relatively little large-scale research showing its effectiveness in promoting better learning outcomes in higher education, especially in mathematics classes. In this study, we examined the data compiled from both quantitative and qualitative measures such as item scores on a common final and attitude survey results between a flipped and a traditional Introductory Linear Algebra class taught by two individual instructors at a state university in California in Fall 2013. Students in the flipped class were asked to watch short video lectures made by the instructor and complete a short online quiz prior to each class attendance. The class time was completely devoted to problem solving in group settings where students were prompted to communicate their reasoning with proper mathematical terms and structured sentences verbally and in writing. Examination of the quality and depth of student responses from the common final exam showed that students in the flipped class produced more comprehensive and well-explained responses to the questions that required reasoning, creating examples, and more complex use of mathematical objects. Furthermore, students in the flipped class performed superiorly in the overall comprehension of the content with a 21% increase in the median final exam score. Overall, students felt more confident about their ability to learn mathematics independently, showed better retention of materials over time, and enjoyed the flipped experience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Murphy et al. found that the combined post-class approach was an effective way for students to reflect on knowledge learned in class and to help instructors evaluate student learning performance and reflect on the flipped classroom model as a whole.
“The researchers found that this combined approach to post-class activity was an effective way for students to reflect on knowledge learned in class and to help instructors evaluate student learning performance and reflect on the flipped classroom model as a whole.”
From Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Murphy et al., 2016
This finding aligns with Murphy et al. (2016), who required students to do online quizzes and hand in assigned homework problems from the textbook.
“This finding aligns with a study by (Murphy et al., 2016) who required students to do online quizzes and hand in assigned homework problems from the textbook.”
From Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Murphy et al., 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Exploring the Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom on STEM Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis
Gong, J., Cai, S., & Cheng, M. (2024) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09700-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Murphy, J., Chang, J.-M., & Suaray, K.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Long Beach (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Jen-Mei
- Venue
- International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-11-27
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 653-673
- ISSN
- 0020-739X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5211
- OpenAlex
- W2338073987
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Keywords
- flipped classroom, linear algebra, cooperative learning, student attitudes, student performance, mathematics education, online quizzes, video lectures, problem solving, student self-confidence, higher education mathematics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review