Cited by 28Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTryptophan and brain disordersMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Reversal of lipopolysaccharide-induced learning and memory deficits by agmatine in mice

Borikar, Sachin P., Dongare, Shruti I., Danao, Kishor R.·2022·International Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Materials and methods Learning and memory functions in animals were evaluated by using Novel object recognition (NOR) and Morris water maze (MWM) tests. Following 7 days of LPS administration, animals were subjected to NOR test on Day-8 and MWM test on Days-9 to 13 for the assessment of recognition and spatial learning and memory, respectively. Results LPS administration produced significant deficits in recognition and spatial memory in mice after seven days of LPS administration. In LPS pre-treated mice, agmatine treatment on Day-8 resulted in the increased exploration to the novel object. Agmatine treatment (Day 8-12) in mice showed reduction in the escape latency and time spent in the target quadrant (probe trial) in the MWM test. However, co-administration of agmatine with LPS in mice for 7 days showed higher discrimination index in NOR test on Day-8. This co-administration also decreased escape latency and time spent in the target quadrant in MWM test on Days 9-13 as compared to LPS control group. Conclusion Results implies the protective and curative effects of agmatine against LPS-induced loss of memory functions in experimental animals.HighlightsSubchronic but not acute lipopolysaccharides induce memory deficitsLipopolysaccharides impairs recognition and spatial memory in mice.Agmatine prevents lipopolysaccharides-induced loss of memory.Agmatine reverses deficits in learning and memory by lipopolysaccharides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207454.2020.1830086

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borikar, S. P., Dongare, S. I., & Danao, K. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Pharmacology, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research Shirpur, Dist-Dhule, Maharashtra, India
  • Department of Pharmaceutics, Gurunanak College of Pharmacy, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Dadasaheb Balpande College of Pharmacy, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
Corresponding author
Danao, Kishor R.
Venue
International Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2021-01-18
Volume
132
Issue
6
Pages
621-632
ISSN
  • 0020-7454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5245
OpenAlex
W3094507491
Cited by
28
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
agmatine, lipopolysaccharide, learning and memory impairment, neuroinflammation, neuroprotection, spatial memory, recognition memory, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Agmatine, Animals, Hippocampus, Lipopolysaccharides, Memory, Memory Disorders, Maze Learning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review