The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An approach for estimating the end-of-life product disassembly effort and cost
Abstract
Disassembly is the process of physically separating a product into its parts or subassembly pieces. The overall economics of the disassembly process, and in particular the cost to disassemble, is still not well understood. In this paper our goal is to introduce a methodology that will support and facilitate the economic analysis of the disassembly activity. We present a multi-factor model to compute the disassembly effort index (DEI) score, which is representative of the total operating cost to disassemble a product. The DEI score can then be compared against the projected market value of the disassembled parts and subassemblies to get an economic measure. To develop the DEI model we surveyed a variety of commercial disassembly facilities. Based on these surveys we propose a multifactor weighted estimation scheme. The seven factors are (i) time, (ii) tools, (iii) fixture, (iv) access, (v) instruct, (vi) hazard, and (vii) force requirements. The DEI scale is defined in the 0 to 100 range. This range is assigned on a weighted basis to each of the seven factors. For each factor, an independent utility scale is formulated, using the assigned range as anchors. Using a conversion scale the DEI score is used to derive an estimate of disassembly cost and the disassembly return on investment. An example is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ilgin, M. A., & Gupta, S. M. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037 · Cited by 1,015
Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review
Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., Choi, J.-K., Kim, H., & Thurston, D. (2010) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4002308 · Cited by 469
Ease of disassembly of products to support circular economy strategies
Vanegas, P., Peeters, J. R., Cattrysse, D., Tecchio, P., Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., Dewulf, W., & Duflou, J. R. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.022 · Cited by 353
Financial viability of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery recycling
Lander, L., Cleaver, T., Rajaeifar, M. A., Nguyen-Tien, V., Elliott, R. J. R., Heidrich, O., Kendrick, E., Edge, J. S., & Offer, G. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102787 · Cited by 304
Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., & Akhtar, S. (2021) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm14120605 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, S. K., Yedlarajiah, P., & Narendra, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 657-673
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2168412825
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An approach for estimating the end-of-life product disassembly effort and cost. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/002075400189356
- The paper
- Das, S. K., Yedlarajiah, P., & Narendra, R. (2000). An approach for estimating the end-of-life product disassembly effort and cost. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075400189356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.