The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ease of disassembly of products to support circular economy strategies
Open accessAbstract
Circular economy strategies encourage, among others, concrete actions to extend the product lifetime. Product's repair and reuse, and component harvesting for reuse, all require the facilitated access to product components. Consequently, a reduction of the disassembly time and the related costs will increase the economic feasibility of product lifetime extension and therefore increase the viability of a circular economy in industrialised regions. Furthermore, disassembly has the potential to significantly increase the recycling yield and purity for precious metals, critical metals and plastics. For this reason, the European Commission and several ecolabels have considered to include design for disassembly requirements in legislation or voluntary environmental instruments. However, up to date, there is no standardised method to evaluate the ease of disassembly in an unambiguous manner with a good trade-off between the efforts required to apply the method and the accuracy of the determined disassembly time. The article proposes a robust method "eDiM" (ease of Disassembly Metric), to calculate the disassembly time based on the Maynard operation sequence technique (MOST). A straightforward calculation sheet is employed in eDiM to calculate the disassembly time given the sequence of actions and basic product information. This makes the results fully verifiable in an unambiguous manner, which makes eDiM suited to be used in policy measures in contrast to the results of prior developed methods One of the innovative aspects of eDiM is the categorization of disassembly tasks in six categories, which provides better insights on which disassembly tasks are the most time consuming and how the product design could be improved. The proposed method is illustrated by means of a case study of an LCD monitor. The presented case study demonstrates how the proposed method can be used in a policy context and how the calculated disassembly times per category can provide insights to manufacturers to improve the disassemblability of their products. The results also demonstrate how the proposed method can produce realistic results with only limited detail of input data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global perspectives on e-waste
Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf, H., Sinha-Khetriwal, D., Schnellmann, M., & Böni, H. (2005) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.001 · Cited by 1,709
Products that go round: exploring product life extension through design
Bakker, C., Wang, F., Huisman, J., & den Hollander, M. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.028 · Cited by 721
Sustainable materials with both eyes open
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-3871 · Cited by 434
Performance indicators for a circular economy: A case study on post-industrial plastic waste
Huysman, S., De Schaepmeester, J., Ragaert, K., Dewulf, J., & De Meester, S. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.013 · Cited by 421
Assessment of Precious Metal Flows During Preprocessing of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
Chancerel, P., Meskers, C. E. M., Hagelüken, C., & Rotter, V. S. (2009) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00171.x · Cited by 389
Wang, F., Huisman, J., Meskers, C. E. M., Schluep, M., Stevels, A., & Hagelüken, C. (2012) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.029 · Cited by 247
Efficiency and feasibility of product disassembly: A case-based study
Duflou, J. R., Seliger, G., Kara, S., Umeda, Y., Ometto, A., & Willems, B. (2008) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2008.09.009 · Cited by 235
Self-citationEvaluation of disassemblability to enable design for disassembly in mass production
Desai, A., & Mital, A. (2003) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/s0169-8141(03)00067-2 · Cited by 224
An approach for estimating the end-of-life product disassembly effort and cost
Das, S. K., Yedlarajiah, P., & Narendra, R. (2000) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/002075400189356 · Cited by 202
Cited by
Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 · Cited by 894
A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union
Mhatre, P., Panchal, R., Singh, A., & Bibyan, S. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.008 · Cited by 448
Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Seuring, S., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jugend, D., De Camargo Fiorini, P., Latan, H., & Izeppi, W. C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416 · Cited by 346
Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy
Bag, S., Wood, L. C., Mangla, S. K., & Luthra, S. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502 · Cited by 339
Rossi, E., Bertassini, A. C., Ferreira, C. D. S., Neves do Amaral, W. A., & Ometto, A. R. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119137 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanegas, P., Peeters, J. R., Cattrysse, D., Tecchio, P., Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., Dewulf, W., & Duflou, J. R.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 135
- Pages
- 323-334
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2735635571
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 42.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ease of disassembly of products to support circular economy strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.022
- The paper
- Vanegas, P., Peeters, J. R., Cattrysse, D., Tecchio, P., Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., Dewulf, W., & Duflou, J. R. (2018). Ease of disassembly of products to support circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.