Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis

Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., O’grady, P.·2007·International Journal of Production Research

Abstract

Given the size, complexity and dynamic nature of many supply chains, there is a need to understand the impact of disruptions on the operation of the system. This paper presents a network-based modelling methodology to determine how changes or disruptions propagate in supply chains and how those changes or disruptions affect the supply chain system. Understanding the propagation of disruptions and gaining insight into the operational performance of a supply chain system under the duress of an unexpected change can lead to a better understanding of supply chain disruptions and how to lessen their effects. The modelling approach presented, Disruption Analysis Network (DA_NET), models how changes disseminate through a supply chain system and calculates the impact of the attributes by determining the states that are reachable from a given initial marking in a supply chain network. This ability will permit better management of the supply chain and thus will allow an organization to offer quicker response times to the customer, lower costs throughout the chain, and to the end customer higher levels of flexibility and agility, lower inventories throughout the chain (both with work-in-process and inventories), lower levels of obsolescence and a reduced bullwhip effect throughout the chain. This is of particular benefit in large-scale systems, since it can give the user the ability to perform detailed analysis of a dynamic system without the computational burden of a full-scale execution of the model. Consequently, the model may then be segmented to evaluate only the portions or sub-networks that are affected by changes in an initial marking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207540500362138

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., & O’grady, P.
Venue
International Journal of Production Research
Published
2007-02-20
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
1665-1682
ISSN
  • 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-588X
OpenAlex
W1968334972
Cited by
269
References
23
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207540500362138
The paper
Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., & O’grady, P. (2007). Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500362138

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.