The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis
Abstract
Given the size, complexity and dynamic nature of many supply chains, there is a need to understand the impact of disruptions on the operation of the system. This paper presents a network-based modelling methodology to determine how changes or disruptions propagate in supply chains and how those changes or disruptions affect the supply chain system. Understanding the propagation of disruptions and gaining insight into the operational performance of a supply chain system under the duress of an unexpected change can lead to a better understanding of supply chain disruptions and how to lessen their effects. The modelling approach presented, Disruption Analysis Network (DA_NET), models how changes disseminate through a supply chain system and calculates the impact of the attributes by determining the states that are reachable from a given initial marking in a supply chain network. This ability will permit better management of the supply chain and thus will allow an organization to offer quicker response times to the customer, lower costs throughout the chain, and to the end customer higher levels of flexibility and agility, lower inventories throughout the chain (both with work-in-process and inventories), lower levels of obsolescence and a reduced bullwhip effect throughout the chain. This is of particular benefit in large-scale systems, since it can give the user the ability to perform detailed analysis of a dynamic system without the computational burden of a full-scale execution of the model. Consequently, the model may then be segmented to evaluate only the portions or sub-networks that are affected by changes in an initial marking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications
Murata, T. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.24143 · Cited by 10,606
Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546 · Cited by 4,698
Designing and Managing the Supply Chain
Simchi‐Levi, D. (2002) · Cited by 1,780
Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research
Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675560310001627016 · Cited by 1,630
The Collaborative Supply Chain
Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090210806333 · Cited by 1,108
Sahin, F., & Robinson, E. P. (2002) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01654.x · Cited by 731
Identifying sources of uncertainty to generate supply chain redesign strategies
van der Vorst, J. G. A. J., & Beulens, A. J. M. (2002) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030210437951 · Cited by 600
BUILDING A SECURE AND RESILIENT SUPPLY NETWORK.
Rice, J. B., & Caniato, F. F. A. (2003) · Supply chain management review · Cited by 597
Information Distortion in a Supply Chain
LeeHau, L., PadmanabhanV., & WhangSeungjin (1997) · Management Science · doi:10.5555/2869050.2869060 · Cited by 424
Mitroff, I. I., & Alpaslan, M. C. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 294
Cited by
Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective
Scheibe, K. P., & Blackhurst, J. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1355123 · Cited by 409
Self-citationThe Northern Sea Route versus the Suez Canal: Cases from bulk shipping
Schøyen, H., & Bråthen, S. (2011) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.003 · Cited by 300
Shekarian, M., & Mellat Parast, M. (2021) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2020.1763935 · Cited by 303
Intelligent digital twin (iDT) for supply chain stress-testing, resilience, and viability
Ivanov, D. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108938 · Cited by 270
Raja Santhi, A., & Muthuswamy, P. (2022) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics6040081 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., & O’grady, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-02-20
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1665-1682
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W1968334972
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 11.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207540500362138
- The paper
- Wu, T., Blackhurst, J., & O’grady, P. (2007). Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500362138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.