The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way
Abstract
The Toyota Production System has led to a movement of ‘lean production’ focused on taking waste out of value streams. Most applications have been to high volume, and relatively standardized products. Under this system work becomes highly standardized specifying to the second what the operator should do. Buffers are precisely sized and controlled through various types of pull signals. When possible, use of one-piece flow cells result in a completely balanced production line. The performance benefits of these lean systems are often remarkable, greatly improving quality, cost, and delivery. But what of companies that are not making standardized products at high volume? What can they learn from lean? In this paper we argue there is a fundamental misunderstanding of TPS, viewing it as a specific tool kit technically implemented in a formulaic way to achieve pre-specified results. In fact, TPS is a philosophy that can be better described as a set of general principles of organizing and managing an enterprise which can help any organization get on a path of positive learning and improvement. A case example of a low volume, highly customized artistic clay tile company illustrates the process by which the firm used TPS to learn how to understand its process, gain stability and control, empower its workforce, and become far more profitable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Action Research and Minority Problems
Lewin, K. (1946) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x · Cited by 6,554
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Lean Thinking—Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600967 · Cited by 2,122
The Principles of Sociotechnical Design
Cherns, A. (1976) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872677602900806 · Cited by 1,063
Cited by
Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2012-0315 · Cited by 983
Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013 · Cited by 678
Lean practices and their effect on performance: a literature review
Negrão, L. L. L., Godinho Filho, M., & Marodin, G. (2016) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2016.1231853 · Cited by 243
Godinho Filho, M., Ganga, G. M. D., & Gunasekaran, A. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1201606 · Cited by 182
A literature review of empirical research methodology in lean manufacturing
Vamsi Krishna Jasti, N., & Kodali, R. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-04-2012-0169 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Lander, E., & Liker, J. K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-08-15
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3681-3698
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2169940057
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207540701223519
- The paper
- Lander, E., & Liker, J. K. (2007). The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701223519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.