The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Change process: a key enabler for building resilient SMEs
Abstract
Resilience is seen as a key organisational capability for sustainability in the current turbulent environment. At the same time, for organisations to be more sustainable and resilient, the delivery of innovative responses to the market through continuous change and improvement is necessary. If small and medium enterprises (SMEs) account for over 70% of the world's production, and there is a growing mandate to create sustainable SMEs, then instilling, developing and implementing change capabilities is paramount in making progress towards sustainability and resilience. Therefore, this article aims to demonstrate that change management process capability is fundamental to creating resilience in SMEs. This study is based on a multiple case study methodology through semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with 232 senior managers in 37 manufacturing SMEs across Europe. This article demonstrates that sustainability and resilience in SMEs will be enhanced by (1) ability to embrace organisational and people dimensions as well as operational aspects of change management, and (2) paying attention to long-term planning and external communication to drive change proactively. This article builds a bridge between the theoretical starting point, the results of empirical research and the usability of the presented findings in practice in order to contribute to the development of more resilient SMEs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hence, how change is managed is critical to resilience (Ates and Bititci 2011).”
From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Ates and Bititci 2011
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,904
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
(2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77282-0_6 · Cited by 17,411
(1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92196-5 · Cited by 12,205
Building theories from case study research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009) · STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI · doi:10.3280/so2008-002004 · Cited by 11,403
Field theory in social science
Reed, R., & Lewin, K. (1951) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/586914 · Cited by 6,792
Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed)
Morse, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(96)00056-6 · Cited by 5,613
Field Theory in Social Science
French, R. L., Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1953) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418749 · Cited by 5,192
Building the Resilient Supply Chain
Christopher, M. G., & Peck, H. (2004) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090410700275 · Cited by 4,357
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Barton, M and Christianson, M. 2006. Organizational resilience: a social mechanisms perspective.Symposium presented at the 2006 annual academy of management meeting, 11–16 August, Atlanta, GA
- Beer M, 2000, Harvard Business Review, 133
- Bell MA, 2002, The five principles of organizational resilience
- Bolton D, 2004, Mt Eliza Business Review, 7, 56
- Coutu D, 2002, Harvard Business Review, 80, 46
- Dawson P, 1994, Organisational change: A processual approach
- Doe PJ, 1994, Canadian Business Review, 21, 22
- Fiksel J, 2006, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2, 1
- Hamel GA, 2003, Harvard Business Review, 81, 52
- Hart S, 1999, Sloan Management Review, 41, 23
- Jick T, 1991, Implementing change
- Lissack MR, 2002, Public Management Review, 4, 72
- Reinmoeller P, 2005, MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 61
- Sirkin HL, 2005, Harvard Business Review, 83, 109
- Sheffi Y, 2006, Logistics Quarterly, 12, 12
- Sheffi Y, 2005, MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 41
- Starr R, 2003, Strategy and Business, 30, 1
- Tompkins JA, 2007, Industrial Management, 49, 14
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027
“Hence, how change is managed is critical to resilience (Ates and Bititci 2011).”
BackgroundKamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.023 · Cited by 1,251
Organizational Resilience: A Valuable Construct for Management Research?
Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2020) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12239 · Cited by 1,321
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory
Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020 · Cited by 988
Metadata
- Authors
- Ates, A., & Bititci, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ates, Aylin
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-09-15
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 5601-5618
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2153466124
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 18.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Production Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
- Keywords
- change management, organizational resilience, small and medium-sized enterprises, manufacturing SMEs, long-term planning, external communication, organizational capabilities, continuous improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review