The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supply chain operational risk mitigation: a collaborative approach
Open accessAbstract
Along with increasing supply chain risks due to economic and environmental changes, it is imperative to answer the question of how to reduce supply chain risks. This study examines supply chain collaboration as a risk mitigation strategy. The study examines three types of risks, namely supply risk, demand risk and process risk in relation to three types of collaboration, namely supplier collaboration, customer collaboration and internal collaboration, as a mechanism to mitigate those risks. The proposed relationship model is tested with data collected from 203 manufacturing companies in Australia. The results show that each area of collaboration effectively reduces its respective supply chain risk, but only the mitigation of process risk and demand risk has a direct effect on supply chain performance. In addition, both supply risk and demand risk increase process risk. We offer theoretical and practical implications of the findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Cited by
Munir, M., Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A., & Farooq, S. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107667 · Cited by 452
Shekarian, M., & Mellat Parast, M. (2021) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2020.1763935 · Cited by 303
Chowdhury, M. T., Sarkar, A., Paul, S. K., & Moktadir, M. A. (2022) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-020-00166-9 · Cited by 266
Salamai, A., Hussain, O. K., Saberi, M., Chang, E., & Hussain, F. K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2902191 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., Sohal, A. S., & Prajogo, D. I.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2186-2199
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2082632948
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply chain operational risk mitigation: a collaborative approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207543.2012.727490
- The paper
- Chen, J., Sohal, A. S., & Prajogo, D. I. (2013). Supply chain operational risk mitigation: a collaborative approach. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.727490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
