The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends
Abstract
The rapid prototyping has been developed from the 1980s to produce models and prototypes until the technologies evolution today. Nowadays, these technologies have other names such as 3D printing or additive manufacturing, and so forth, but they all have the same origins from rapid prototyping. The design and manufacturing process stood the same until new requirements such as a better integration on production line, a largest series of manufacturing or the reduce weight of products due to heavy costs of machines and materials. The ability to produce complex geometries allows proposing of design and manufacturing solutions in the industrial field in order to be ever more effective. The additive manufacturing (AM) technology develops rapidly with news solutions and markets which sometimes need to demonstrate their reliability. The community needs to survey some evolutions such as the new exchange format, the faster 3D printing systems, the advanced numerical simulation or the emergence of new use. This review is addressed to persons who wish have a global view on the AM and improve their understanding. We propose to review the different AM technologies and the new trends to get a global overview through the engineering and manufacturing process. This article describes the engineering and manufacturing cycle with the 3D model management and the most recent technologies from the evolution of additive manufacturing. Finally, the use of AM resulted in new trends that are exposed below with the description of some new economic activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Jiang, J., Xu, X., & Stringer, J. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · doi:10.3390/jmmp2040064 · Cited by 527
Deep learning for topology optimization of 2D metamaterials
Kollmann, H. T., Abueidda, D. W., Koric, S., Guleryuz, E., & Sobh, N. A. (2020) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109098 · Cited by 361
Delic, M., & Eyers, D. R. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107689 · Cited by 325
Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D. J. J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., et al. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925 · Cited by 268
Post-Process Treatments for Additive-Manufactured Metallic Structures: A Comprehensive Review
Ge, J., Pillay, S., & Ning, H. (2023) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-023-08051-9 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardan, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-11-23
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3118-3132
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2210332646
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909
- The paper
- Gardan, J. (2016). Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.