The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Industry 5.0 a Human-Centred Approach? A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Industry 5.0 presents itself as a strategy that puts the human factor at the centre of production, where the well-being of the worker is prioritized, as well as more sustainable and resilient production systems. For human centricity, it is necessary to empower human beings and, respectively, industrial operators, to improve their individual skills and competences in collaboration or cooperation with digital technologies. This research’s main purpose and distinguishing point are to determine whether Industry 5.0 is truly human-oriented and how human centricity can be created with Industry 5.0 technologies. For that, this systematic literature review article analyses and clarifies the concepts and ideologies of Industry 5.0 and its respective technologies (Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Human-robot collaboration, Digitalization), as well as the strategies of human centricity, with the aim of achieving sustainable and resilient systems, especially for the worker.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines
Snyder, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 · Cited by 11,524
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Italian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2427/5768 · Cited by 3,374
Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception
Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006 · Cited by 2,557
Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications
Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q.-V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 · Cited by 1,890
Industry 5.0—A Human-Centric Solution
Nahavandi, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11164371 · Cited by 1,695
Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect
Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., Wuest, T., Mourtzis, D., & Wang, L. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017 · Cited by 1,300
Adel, A. (2022) · Journal of Cloud Computing · doi:10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5 · Cited by 864
Ivanov, D. (2023) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892 · Cited by 833
Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10124182 · Cited by 687
Cited by
Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J., & Amiri, M. (2025) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101761 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Alves, J., Lima, T. M., & Gaspar, P. D.
- Venue
- Processes
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-01-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 193
- ISSN
- 2227-9717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313890603
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Industry 5.0 a Human-Centred Approach? A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/pr11010193
- The paper
- Alves, J., Lima, T. M., & Gaspar, P. D. (2023). Is Industry 5.0 a Human-Centred Approach? A Systematic Review. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
