The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CROSS‐CULTURAL VARIATIONS IN RELATIONSHIP RULES
Abstract
A British study of the informal rules of 22 social relationships was replicated among Japanese, Hong Kong and Italian samples. Subjects were asked to rate the importance of 33 common and varying numbers of relationship‐specific rules to each of these relationships on a 9‐point bipolar scale. Multivariate analyses showed each culture has a structure of highly endorsed rules, although a number of cross‐cultural differences emerged in the nature of these rules, particularly those relating to intimacy. Certain cross‐cultural predictions were confirmed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tanaka-Matsumi, J., & Marsella, A. J. (1976) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/002202217674001 · Cited by 109
Cited by
The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals
Singelis, T. M. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294205014 · Cited by 3,605
Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1197754 · Cited by 3,252
Marshall, T. C. (2008) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407507086810 · Cited by 204
Cross-cultural consensus in personality judgments.
Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., Dong, Q., Kenny, D. A., Fang, X., Winquist, L., & Yu, D. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.558 · Cited by 131
Does loneliness thrive in relational freedom or restriction? The culture-loneliness framework
Heu, L. C., van Zomeren, M., & Hansen, N. (2021) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/1089268020959033 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Argyle, M., Henderson, M., Bond, M., Iizuka, Y., & Contarello, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-02-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 287-315
- ISSN
- 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-066X
- OpenAlex
- W1992352928
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
