Cited by 21Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots

Adaptive PID-fractional-order nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for cable-driven manipulators using time-delay estimation

Wang, Yaoyao, Peng, Jiawei, Zhu, Kangwu, Chen, Bai, Wu, Hongtao·2020·International Journal of Systems Science

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptive proportional-integral-derivative fractional-order nonsingular terminal sliding mode (PID-FONTSM) control for the cable-driven manipulators using time-delay estimation (TDE). The proposed control uses TDE technique to obtain the lumped system dynamics and brings in an effective model-free structure. Then, a PID-FONTSM surface is designed to further enhance the control performance. The proposed PID-FONTSM surface uses the FONTSM error dynamic as its inner loop and utilises a PID-type surface with FONTSM variable as its outer loop. Benefitting from this structure, the proposed PID-FONTSM surface enjoys the advantages from both PID and FONTSM simultaneously. Afterwards, an adaptive algorithm is developed, to timely and precisely regulate the control gain for the robust term. The proposed control method is model-free, highly accurate and essentially continuous thanks to the TDE technique and developed PID-FONTSM surface and adaptive algorithm. The stability of the closed-loop control system under TDE and PID-FONTSM dynamics is proved using Lyapunov stability theory. Finally, comparative simulations were conducted to verify the effectiveness and superiorities of our proposed control method over the existing methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207721.2020.1808732

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other controller methods commonly used in integration with the TDE mechanism for attenuation of system nonlinearities include PID, adaptive sliding mode controller (SMC), and fuzzy logic approach-based control methods.

    “Other controller methods commonly used in integration with the TDE mechanism for attenuation of system nonlinearities include, for example, the PID controller [18], adaptive sliding mode controller (SMC) [19], and fuzzy logic approach-based [20] control methods.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Peng, J., Zhu, K., Chen, B., & Wu, H.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
  • Shanghai Institute of Spaceflight Control Technology, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
Corresponding author
Wang, Yaoyao
Venue
International Journal of Systems Science
Published
2020-08-25
Volume
51
Issue
15
Pages
3118-3133
ISSN
  • 0020-7721 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5319
OpenAlex
W3080487503
Cited by
21
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Systems Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M630552, 2019T120424)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51705243)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20170789)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Keywords
cable-driven manipulator, PID control, time delay estimation, adaptive control, model-free control, Lyapunov stability, robust control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review