Cited by 3Advanced Control Systems DesignStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Improvement of Proportional-Integral-Derivative Control for Time-Delay Nonlinear Systems by a Time-Delay Estimation Method

Fatima Nahri, Syeda Nadiah, Du, Shengzhi, van Wyk, Barend J., Kayode Ajayi, Oluwaseun, Nyasulu, Tawanda Denzel, Yu, Hui·2025·2025 33rd Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC)

Abstract

Nonlinearity and other existing uncertainties, such as time delay, are commonly found in systems involving realistic operations. Lately, the time-delay estimation (TDE) mechanism has been gaining popularity in various control theory-related fields concerning the compensation of uncertainties present in control systems. This paper examines the effects of nonlinear backlash-like hysteresis and system time delay using a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, followed by introducing a TDE technique to a PID-controlled time-delay system. Experimental studies using simulation results are performed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed TDE-PID control method by emphasizing the estimation and attenuation of the nonlinearity effect present in a time-delay system. The results indicate an improved and robust transient system response under the impact of uncertainties like hysteresis and system disturbance present in a time-delay system. Further, the proposed TDE-PID control method is analysed for systems with varying time delays, and the simulation results further substantiate that the proposed method is effective. By considering various uncertainties, the proposed method can be used in different industrial applications, such as the frequency and voltage control in power systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/saupec65723.2025.10944363

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The performance of an ADRC controller concerning estimation and attenuation of nonlinear backlash-like hysteresis under time delay and uncertainties is greatly improved in conjunction with TDE mechanisms.

    “Moreover, recent research has shown that the performance of an ADRC controller concerning estimation and attenuation of nonlinear backlash-like hysteresis under time delay and uncertainties is greatly improved in conjunction with TDE mechanisms [8,17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fatima Nahri, S. N., Du, S., van Wyk, B. J., Kayode Ajayi, O., Nyasulu, T. D., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
  • Tshwane University of Technology,Department of Electrical Engineering,Pretoria,South Africa
  • Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
Venue
2025 33rd Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-01-29
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4409103300
Cited by
3
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3
FWCI
6.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
time delay estimation, PID control, time-delay systems, time-varying delays, disturbance rejection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review