The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategy Formulation as a Political Process
Abstract
The article presents a discussion on strategic business planning as a political process. The formation of strategy in organizations is a continuous process. Specific dilemmas within the firm, or in the firm's environment, may raise the organization members' consciousness of strategy and allow financial analysts to think of strategy formulation as an intentional process built around certain discrete decisions; but strategy is being formed implicitly all the time. Choices are made and acted upon in processes involving individuals and sub-groupings, at various organizational levels, that develop into the pattern of thinking about the world, evaluating that world, and acting upon that world that is called as strategy. Study of the process of strategy formulation therefore involves analyses of both discrete and identifiable decision events and of the pathways to and outcomes of those decision events, together with the connections between successive decisions over time. Strategy formulation is contextually based. Strategy formulation can be understood as a process of political decision-making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392088 · Cited by 7,917
A Systems Analysis of Political Life
Albrow, M. C., & Easton, D. (1966) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589063 · Cited by 3,333
(1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,109
Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice.
Keiser, R. L., Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1972) · Man · doi:10.2307/2800984 · Cited by 1,217
Information Control as a Power Resource
Pettigrew, A. M. (1972) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803857200600202 · Cited by 343
Self-citationThe Politics of Organisational Decision-making.
Holtham, C. (1975) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1975.77 · Cited by 219
Towards a Political Theory of Organizational Intervention
Pettigrew, A. (1975) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872677502800301 · Cited by 114
Self-citationImplementing strategic decisions
Mumford, E., & Pettigrew, A. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Cited by
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes
Stacey, R. D. (1995) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250160606 · Cited by 1,039
Strategy tools‐in‐use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice
Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2270 · Cited by 516
Cycles of organizational change
Mintzberg, H., & Westley, F. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250130905 · Cited by 400
Johnson, G. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090107 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Pettigrew, A. M.
- Venue
- International Studies of Management & Organization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 78-87
- ISSN
- 0020-8825 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0911
- OpenAlex
- W2124509314
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategy Formulation as a Political Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00208825.1977.11656228
- The paper
- Pettigrew, A. M. (1977). Strategy Formulation as a Political Process. International Studies of Management & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1977.11656228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.