The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Institutionalised Co-production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments
Abstract
In developing countries in particular, services are often delivered through unorthodox organisational arrangements that cannot simply be dismissed as relics of ‘traditional’ institutions, or as incomplete modern organisations. Some have emerged recently, and represent institutional adaptations to specific political and logistical circumstances. We need to expand the range of organisational categories that are considered worthy of study and develop a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of unorthodox arrangements. The concept of institutionalised co-production provides a useful point of entry. Institutionalised co-production is defined as: the provision of public services (broadly defined, to include regulation) through a regular long-term relationship between state agencies and organised groups of citizens, where both make substantial resource contributions. We explain some varieties of institutionalised co-production arrangements; explore why they appear to be relatively so widespread in poor countries; and relate the concept to broader ideas about public organisation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Wilson, R. (1981) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x · Cited by 761
Cited by
Poverty and Access to Health Care in Developing Countries
Peters, D. H., Garg, A., Bloom, G., Walker, D. G., Brieger, W. R., & Hafizur Rahman, M. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1425.011 · Cited by 1,522
Descending the sanitation ladder in urban Uganda: evidence from Kampala Slums
Kwiringira, J., Atekyereza, P., Niwagaba, C., & Günther, I. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-624 · Cited by 96
Renegotiating Public Value with Co-Production
Cordella, A., Paletti, A., & Shaikh, M. (2018) · Oxford Scholarship Online · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0008 · Cited by 15
What makes “difficult” settings difficult? Contextual challenges for accountability
Joshi, A. (2023) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/dpr.12681 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Joshi, A., & Moore, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Development Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 31-49
- ISSN
- 0022-0388 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9140
- OpenAlex
- W2097048369
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.