Cited by 12Migration and Labor DynamicsAgricultural Economics and PracticesSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Partition, Migration, and Jute Cultivation in India

Open access
Bharadwaj, Prashant, Fenske, James·2012·Journal of Development Studies

Abstract

We show that refugees can play positive roles in receiving economies by looking at the partition of India. We use an instrumental variables strategy to show that migrants played a major part in India's take-up of jute cultivation. Our estimates suggest that migrants fully explain post-partition jute cultivation. Consistent with migrants bringing jute-specific skills with them, we find that migrants did not depress jute yields, did not increase the cultivation of other crops, and did not lower native wages. Our results are robust to migrant selection into districts with the best markets for jute.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00220388.2011.579114

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Altonji J. G., 1991, Immigration, Trade and the Labor Market, 201
  2. 10.1086/426036 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bharadwaj P., 2008, Economic and Political Weekly, 39
  4. Borjas G. J., 1987, The American Economic Review, 77, 531
  5. Borjas G. J., 1991, The American Economic Review, 81, 287
  6. 10.1017/CHOL9780521266949 · DOI
  7. Chatterjee P., 1997, The Present History of West Bengal: Essays in Political Criticism
  8. 10.1086/427464 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S0022050700113385 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S002205070002413X · DOI
  11. Ethier W. J., 1985, The American Economic Review, 75, 691
  12. Fernandes L., 1997, Producing Workers: The Politics of Gender, Class and Culture in the Calcutta Jute Mills
  13. FMR, 2007, Forced Migration Review
  14. 10.1162/003355301753265606 · DOI
  15. Ghosh T., 1999, Case for Labour History: The Jute Industry in Eastern India, 54
  16. Goldin C., 1994, The Regulated Economy: A Historical Approach to Political Economy, 223, 10.7208/chicago/9780226301341.001.0001 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/1923944 · DOI
  18. IJMA, 1963, Annual Summary of Jute and Gunny Statistics
  19. Kakissis J., 2010, New York Times
  20. 10.2307/136326 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/S0022050700049858 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1017/S000305540300090X · DOI
  24. Sen S., 1999, Women and Labour in Late Colonial India: The Bengal Jute Industry
  25. Stewart G. T., 1998, Jute and Empire: The Calcutta Jute Wallahs and the Landscapes of Empire
  26. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.006 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/S1361491697000038 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14984 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Vakil C. N., 1950, Economic Consequences of Divided India: A Study of the Economy of India and Pakistan
  30. 10.1016/0022-1996(86)90003-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bharadwaj, P., & Fenske, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Bharadwaj, Prashant
Venue
Journal of Development Studies
Published
2012-08
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
1084-1107
ISSN
  • 0022-0388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9140
OpenAlex
W3021227061
Cited by
12
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Development Studies (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
Keywords
Partition of India, refugees, migration, jute cultivation, agricultural labor, migrant skills, crop yield, native wages, labor market

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review