The Relationship between Student Cheating and College Fraternity or Sorority Membership
Abstract
This study examines and compares the self-reported cheating behaviors of fraternity and non-fraternily members and the relation between student cheating and the overall level of fraternity or sorority membership on campus. The influence of peer disapproval of cheating on the relationship between fraternity or sorority membership and self-reported cheating is also examined.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some researchers suggested that members of fraternal organizations may engage in higher levels of unethical behaviors (e.g., academic dishonesty) than nonmembers.
“Furthermore, some researchers have suggested that members of fraternal organizations may engage in higher levels of unethical behaviors (e.g., academic dishonesty) than do nonmembers (Martin et al., 2011;McCabe & Bowers, 1996).”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as McCabe & Bowers, 1996
Fraternity and sorority members have been noted to be significantly more likely to cheat on examinations than have nonmembers.
“Cheating was also found to be one of the most prevalent issues among affiliated students: Fraternity and sorority members have been noted to be significantly more likely to cheat on examinations than have nonmembers (McCabe & Bowers, 1996).”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as McCabe & Bowers, 1996
The finding that affiliated participants were less concerned about poor academic/anti-intellectual attitudes supports previous research indicating that involvement in a Greek-lettered organization contributes to poor academics and anti-intellectual attitudes.
“The respondents' results about perceptions concerning poor academic attitudes supports research that has indicated that involvement in a Greek-lettered organization contributes to poor academics and anti-intellectual attitudes.”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as McCabe & Bowers, 1996
The finding that affiliated participants were less concerned about lack of values supports previous findings that fraternities and sororities are incompatible with higher education goals and evidence that members engage in higher levels of unethical behaviors.
“This result supports not only previous findings about underlying assumptions that fraternities and sororities are presumably incompatible with greater goals of higher education and ideas of academia but also evidence that members of fraternal organizations typically engage in higher levels of unethical behaviors than do nonmembers (Maisel, 1990;Martin et al., 2011;McCabe & Bowers, 1996).”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as McCabe & Bowers, 1996
Cites
Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and other Contextual Influences
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shirley, Z. E. (2025) · University of North Texas Dissertation · doi:10.12794/metadc500187
- Authors
- McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J.
- Venue
- NASPA Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 280-291
- ISSN
- 0027-6014 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-5455
- OpenAlex
- W4252906038
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NASPA Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- academic dishonesty, peer disapproval, university students, student organizations, academic integrity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review