The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disentangling Fine Motor Skills’ Relations to Academic Achievement: The Relative Contributions of Visual-Spatial Integration and Visual-Motor Coordination
Abstract
Recent research has established a connection between children's fine motor skills and their academic performance. Previous research has focused on fine motor skills measured prior to elementary school, while the present sample included children ages 5-18 years old, making it possible to examine whether this link remains relevant throughout childhood and adolescence. Furthermore, the majority of research linking fine motor skills and academic achievement has not determined which specific components of fine motor skill are driving this relation. The few studies that have looked at associations of separate fine motor tasks with achievement suggest that copying tasks that tap visual-spatial integration skills are most closely related to achievement. The present study examined two separate elements of fine motor skills--visual-motor coordination and visual-spatial integration--and their associations with various measures of academic achievement. Visual-motor coordination was measured using tracing tasks, while visual-spatial integration was measured using copy-a-figure tasks. After controlling for gender, socioeconomic status, IQ, and visual-motor coordination, and visual-spatial integration explained significant variance in children's math and written expression achievement. Knowing that visual-spatial integration skills are associated with these two achievement domains suggests potential avenues for targeted math and writing interventions for children of all ages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
School readiness and later achievement.
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., et al. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428 · Cited by 5,439
Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control
Doya, K. (2000) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00153-7 · Cited by 964
Davis, J. L., & Matthews, R. N. (2010) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282909346716 · Cited by 71
Cited by
How Are Motor Skills Linked to Children's School Performance and Academic Achievement?
Cameron, C. E., Cottone, E. A., Murrah, W. M., & Grissmer, D. W. (2016) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12168 · Cited by 284
Dunn, W., Little, L., Dean, E., Robertson, S., & Evans, B. (2016) · OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research · doi:10.1177/1539449215617923 · Cited by 119
Ansari, A., & Winsler, A. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036799 · Cited by 65
Tarrasch, R., Margalit-Shalom, L., & Berger, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00281 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, A. G., Rowe, E., & Curby, T. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Genetic Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 514-533
- ISSN
- 0022-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0896
- OpenAlex
- W2033210287
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disentangling Fine Motor Skills’ Relations to Academic Achievement: The Relative Contributions of Visual-Spatial Integration and Visual-Motor Coordination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00221325.2012.717122
- The paper
- Carlson, A. G., Rowe, E., & Curby, T. W. (2013). Disentangling Fine Motor Skills’ Relations to Academic Achievement: The Relative Contributions of Visual-Spatial Integration and Visual-Motor Coordination. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2012.717122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.