Cited by 119Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersChildren's Physical and Motor Development

The State of the Science on Sensory Factors and Their Impact on Daily Life for Children: A Scoping Review

Dunn, Winnie, Little, Lauren, Dean, Evan, Robertson, Sara, Evans, Benjamin·2016·OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify and synthesize research about how sensory factors affect daily life of children. We designed a conceptual model to guide a scoping review of research published from 2005 to October 2014 (10 years). We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO and included studies about sensory perception/processing; children, adolescents/young adults; and participation. We excluded studies about animals, adults, and review articles. Our process resulted in 261 articles meeting criteria. Research shows that children with conditions process sensory input differently than peers. Neuroscience evidence supports the relationship between sensory-related behaviors and brain activity. Studies suggest that sensory processing is linked to social participation, cognition, temperament, and participation. Intervention research illustrates the importance of contextually relevant practices. Future work can examine the developmental course of sensory processing aspects of behavior across the general population and focus on interventions that support children’s sensory processing as they participate in their daily lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1539449215617923

Cites

268 of 268 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, W., Little, L., Dean, E., Robertson, S., & Evans, B.
Affiliations
University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Winnie
Venue
OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
Published
2016-04
Volume
36
Issue
2_suppl
Pages
3S-26S
ISSN
  • 1539-4492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2383
OpenAlex
W2434228612
Cited by
119
References
268
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
29.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Occupational Therapy Foundation
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
sensory processing, sensory perception, children, adolescents, social participation (health and rehabilitation), brain activity, temperament, cognition, developmental course
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Brain, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Perception, Sensation, Temperament, Social Participation, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review