The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Students' Perceptions of Their Classroom Participation and Instructor as a Function of Gender and Context
Abstract
Students' perceptions of their participation and instructor behaviors were examined in the university classroom. Some support for the chilly climate construct was observed; however, gender effects were mediated by general activity level. Differences favoring males were found among students categorized as active participators. Female students' views of their instructors were influenced by instructor gender.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AN INVESTIGATION OF GENDER AND OTHER VARIABLES ON TIME TO COMPLETION OF DOCTORAL DEGREES
Seagram, B. C., Gould, J., & Pyke, S. W. (1998) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1018781118312 · Cited by 228
Self-citation
Cited by
Student participation in the college classroom: an extended multidisciplinary literature review
Rocca, K. A. (2010) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520903505936 · Cited by 526
Gender differences in student participation in an active-learning classroom
Aguillon, S. M., Siegmund, G.-F., Petipas, R. H., Drake, A. G., Cotner, S., & Ballen, C. J. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048 · Cited by 215
Kim, Y. K., & Lundberg, C. A. (2016) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9387-6 · Cited by 150
Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system
Chen, C.-M., & Chen, F.-Y. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.010 · Cited by 141
Gilmartin, S., Denson, N., Li, E., Bryant, A., & Aschbacher, P. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20179 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Crombie, G., Pyke, S. W., Silverthorn, N., Jones, A., & Piccinin, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-76
- ISSN
- 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4640
- OpenAlex
- W1970543683
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
