The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This could be partially explained because d igital reading presents exclusive features that we cannot encounter in print materials such as interactivity, nonlinearity, immediacy in accessing information and the convergence of text, images, audio, and video (Chen & Chen, 2014).”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Chen & Chen, 2014
Citations
Cites
Langenberg, D. N. (2000) · Cited by 4,305
An overview of content analysis
Stemler, S. (2020) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/z6fm-2e34 · Cited by 2,813
Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension
Snow, C. E. (1998) · Cited by 1,813
The Gutenberg elegies: the fate of reading in an electronic age
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4320 · Cited by 840
COIRO, J., & DOBLER, E. (2007) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.42.2.2 · Cited by 786
Learning to Learn: On Training Students to Learn from Texts
Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.2307/1174401 · Cited by 771
Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years
Liu, Z. (2005) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410510632040 · Cited by 664
Educational research, methodology, and measurement: an international handbook
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-5427 · Cited by 432
(2010) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 353
Rethinking scaffolding in the information age
Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.010 · Cited by 280
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Alexander, 1992, Assessing attitudes in middle and secondary schools and community colleges, Journal of Reading, 36, 146
Cited by
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F., Chai, C. S., & Xie, K. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13305 · Cited by 203
Reading and connecting: using social annotation in online classes
Zhu, X., Chen, B., Avadhanam, R. M., Shui, H., & Zhang, R. Z. (2020) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-04-2020-0117 · Cited by 102
Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231216463 · Cited by 59
Interactive features of E-texts’ effects on learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinton-Lisell, V., Seipel, B., Gilpin, S., & Litzinger, C. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1943453 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C.-M., & Chen, F.-Y.
- Affiliations
- National Chengchi University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Chih-Ming
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 67-81
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078252508
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 18.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Keywords
- digital reading, reading comprehension, reading annotation, interactive discussion, reading strategies, reading attitudes, elementary school students, screen-based reading, inferential comprehension, learning satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.010
- The paper
- Chen, C.-M., & Chen, F.-Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.