Cited by 121Higher Education Research StudiesCultural Capital and Social ClassHigher Education Practises and Engagement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Unwritten Rules of Engagement: Social Class Differences in Undergraduates' Academic Strategies

Yee, April·2016·The Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

Research has shown social class differences in undergraduate engagement, yet we know little about the reasons for these differences. Drawing on interviews and participant observation with undergraduates at an urban, public comprehensive university, this ethnographic study investigates the academic engagement strategies of students from different social class backgrounds during their first two years of college. I find that first-generation and middle class students expend strenuous efforts to succeed, with first-generation students employing independent strategies and middle class students employing interactive, as well as independent, strategies. But because middle class students have a broader repertoire of strategies, which include those that are visible and valued by university faculty and staff, they are advantaged in the college context, or field, relative to their first-generation peers. This research shows how culture in the form of social class shapes undergraduates' academic strategies and contributes to their unequal outcomes. It also points to the role of institutions in defining the implicit rules of engagement, such that middle class strategies of interaction are recognized and rewarded while first-generation strategies of independence are largely ignored.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221546.2016.11780889

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Astin A. W., 1984, Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297
  2. Bailey M. J., 2011, Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances, 117
  3. Bettie J., 2003, Women without class: Girls, race, and identity.
  4. Bourdieu P., 1977, Outline of a theory of practice., 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bourdieu P., 1990, Reproduction in education, society, and culture.
  6. Bourdieu P., 1992, An invitation to reflexive sociology.
  7. Bowen W. G., 2009, Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America's public universities., 10.1515/9781400831463 · DOI
  8. Bozick R., 2007, Sociology of Education, 80, 261, 10.1177/003804070708000304 · DOI
  9. Bui K. V. T., 2002, College Student Journal, 5, 3
  10. Cabrera A. F., 2001, Research in Higher Education, 42, 119, 10.1023/A:1026520002362 · DOI
  11. Calarco J. M., 2011, American Sociological Review, 76, 862, 10.1177/0003122411427177 · DOI
  12. Calarco J. M., 2014, American Sociological Review, 79, 1015, 10.1177/0003122414546931 · DOI
  13. Charles C. Z., 2009, Taming the river: Negotiating the academic, financial, and social currents in selective colleges and universities.
  14. Cox R., 2009, The college fear factor: How college students and professors misunderstand each other., 10.4159/9780674053663 · DOI
  15. Creswell J., 2007, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions
  16. Emerson R. M., 1995, Writing ethnographic fieldnotes., 10.7208/chicago/9780226206851.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Engle J., 2008, Moving beyond access: College success of low-income, first-generation students.
  18. Gaztambide-Fernandez R., 2009, The best of the best: Becoming elite at an American boarding school., 10.4159/9780674053878 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772273 · DOI
  20. Harper S. R., 2009, Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations.
  21. Henderson B. B., 2006, Teaching at the people's university: An introduction to the state comprehensive university.
  22. Iloh C., 2014, Human Affairs, 24, 20, 10.2478/s13374-014-0203-3 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/00221546.2006.11778947 · DOI
  24. Jones S. R., 2014, Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues.
  25. Kao G., 1995, American Journal of Education, 103, 121, 10.1086/444094 · DOI
  26. Kao G., 1995, Social Science Quarterly., 76, 1
  27. Khan S., 2011, Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul's School., 10.1515/9781400836222 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/00091380109601795 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., Whitt, E., & Associates., 2005, Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter.
  30. Lareau A., 2000, Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education
  31. Lareau A., 2011, Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life, 10.1525/9780520949904 · DOI
  32. Lareau A., 2016, Sociology of Education.
  33. Lareau A., 1996, Journeys through ethnography: Realistic accounts of fieldwork.
  34. Lareau A., 2003, Theory and Society, 32, 567, 10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004951.04408.b0 · DOI
  35. Lawson M. A., 2013, Review of Educational Research, 83, 432, 10.3102/0034654313480891 · DOI
  36. Lofland J., 2005, Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis
  37. MacLeod J., 1987, Ain't no makin' it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood.
  38. Massey C., 2006, The source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America's selective colleges and universities.
  39. McDonough P. M., 1997, Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity.
  40. Museus S. D., 2014, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 29
  41. 10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256 · DOI
  42. Patton M., 1990, Qualitative evaluation and research methods.
  43. Perna L. W., 2005, Preparing for college: Nine elements for effective outreach.
  44. 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772283 · DOI
  45. Snyder T. D., 2015, Digest of education statistics 2013.
  46. Swidler A., 1986, American Sociological Review, 51, 273, 10.2307/2095521 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Terenzini P. T., 2001, Swimming against the tide: The poor in American higher education.
  48. Tinto V., 1993, Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition
  49. Van Maanen J., 1988, Tales of the field: On writing ethnography.
  50. Walpole M., 2003, The Review of Higher Education, 27, 45, 10.1353/rhe.2003.0044 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Willis P., 1977, Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs.
  52. Wolf-Wendel L., 2009, Journal of College Student Development, 50, 407, 10.1353/csd.0.0077 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Yee, A.
Corresponding author
Yee, April
Venue
The Journal of Higher Education
Published
2016-11
Volume
87
Issue
6
Pages
831-858
ISSN
  • 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4640
OpenAlex
W2545855992
Cited by
121
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
29.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
social class, first-generation college students, middle-class students, undergraduate students, institutional culture, student success, educational inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review