Cited by 751Higher Education Research StudiesSocial and Cultural DynamicsIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes

Walpole, MaryBeth·2003·The Review of Higher Education

Abstract

This study investigated college experiences and outcomes for low and high SES students utilizing data from a longitudinal database. Low SES students engaged in fewer extracurricular activities, worked more, studied less, and reported lower GPAs than their high SES peers. Nine years after entering college, the low SES students had lower incomes, educational attainment, and graduate school attendance than high SES students. These experiential and outcome differences are tied to differences in cultural capital and habitus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/rhe.2003.0044

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to persist to a bachelor's degree or to have graduate degree aspirations.

    “Further, students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to persist through the first year of college, “less likely to persist to a bachelor’s degree or to have graduate degree aspirations” [2], and their aspirations specifically for pursuing advanced degrees in medicine or law are much lower than those of their higher socioeconomic peers [2].”
  • Students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to persist through the first year of college.

    “Further, students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to persist through the first year of college, “less likely to persist to a bachelor’s degree or to have graduate degree aspirations” [2], and their aspirations specifically for pursuing advanced degrees in medicine or law are much lower than those of their higher socioeconomic peers [2].”
  • Students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds have much lower aspirations specifically for pursuing advanced degrees in medicine or law than their higher socioeconomic peers.

    “Further, students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to persist through the first year of college, “less likely to persist to a bachelor’s degree or to have graduate degree aspirations” [2], and their aspirations specifically for pursuing advanced degrees in medicine or law are much lower than those of their higher socioeconomic peers [2].”
  • Many of STAHR students' peers do not need to rely on their own employment to finance their education.

    “unlike many of their peers who do not need to rely on their own employment to finance their education [2].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walpole, M.
Affiliations
Rowan University (US)
Corresponding author
Walpole, MaryBeth
Venue
The Review of Higher Education
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2003-09
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
45-73
ISSN
  • 0162-5748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1090-7009
OpenAlex
W1979244129
Cited by
751
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 40
FWCI
31.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of higher education/The review of higher education (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
socioeconomic status, university students, low-income students, extracurricular activities, student employment, academic performance, cultural capital, habitus, educational attainment, graduate school enrollment, income outcomes, college outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review