Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Race, Class, and Leisure Activity Preferences: Marginality and Ethnicity Revisited

Floyd, Myron F., Shinew, Kimberly J., McGuire, Francis A., Noe, Francis P.·1994·Journal of Leisure Research

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between race, leisure preferences, and class awareness. Based on interest-group theory of class identification, we hypothesized that blacks and whites who define themselves similarly in terms of social class would exhibit similar leisure activity preferences. Data to test this hypothesis came from a national probability survey of 1,607 U.S. adults. The results of the analysis showed similarities in leisure preferences between blacks and whites who defined themselves as middle class. Patterns of leisure preferences, however, tended to diverge among blacks and whites who defined themselves as poor or working class. This divergence was attributed in part to differences between black and white females of the poor or working class.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00222216.1994.11969951

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Floyd, M. F., Shinew, K. J., McGuire, F. A., & Noe, F. P.
Venue
Journal of Leisure Research
Published
1994-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
158-173
ISSN
  • 0022-2216 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-6417
OpenAlex
W1520350927
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race, Class, and Leisure Activity Preferences: Marginality and Ethnicity Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222216.1994.11969951
The paper
Floyd, M. F., Shinew, K. J., McGuire, F. A., & Noe, F. P. (1994). Race, Class, and Leisure Activity Preferences: Marginality and Ethnicity Revisited. Journal of Leisure Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1994.11969951

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.