The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring Leisure Motivation: A Meta-Analysis of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales
Abstract
One approach to studying the motivations for leisure is to focus on the desired goal States that are attained through participation in leisure. The Recreation Experience Preference (REP) scales were developed for measuring these goal States. In an attempt to provide a summary integrative analysis of the structure of the REP scales, the present study conducted a meta-analysis of 36 studies that have used REP items. The studies were used to obtain population estimates of correlations between scale item pairs. Correlations were then used as input to confirmatory factor analysis that tested the structure of domains (item groupings that represent a broad goal construct) and the structure of scales (within-domain item groupings that represent dimensions of the broader goal construct) established in previous research. Results provided support for the a priori domain and scale structures. Inter-item correlations were computed for domains and scales and compared “within” and “between” clusters. The results show high average inter-item correlations within scales and domains and relatively low average correlations between domains and scales. Variability of inter-item domain correlations due to response scale, instruction set, geographic location of study, and type of recreation area visited was tested. Overall consistency in domains and scales was shown. Recommendations are made to help assure appropriate applications and advance refinement of the REP scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ideal Affect: Cultural Causes and Behavioral Consequences
Tsai, J. L. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00043.x · Cited by 781
Psychosocial Outcomes as Motivations for Visiting Nearby Urban Green Spaces
Home, R., Hunziker, M., & Bauer, N. (2012) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2012.687644 · Cited by 109
Ding, X., & Xu, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293050 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Manfredo, M. J., Driver, B. L., & Tarrant, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Leisure Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 188-213
- ISSN
- 0022-2216 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-6417
- OpenAlex
- W1495489389
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Leisure Motivation: A Meta-Analysis of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222216.1996.11949770
- The paper
- Manfredo, M. J., Driver, B. L., & Tarrant, M. A. (1996). Measuring Leisure Motivation: A Meta-Analysis of the Recreation Experience Preference Scales. Journal of Leisure Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1996.11949770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.