Cited by 781Cultural Differences and ValuesEmotions and Moral BehaviorPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Ideal Affect: Cultural Causes and Behavioral Consequences

Tsai, Jeanne L.·2007·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Most research focuses on actual affect, or the affective states that people actually feel. In this article, I demonstrate the importance and utility of studying ideal affect, or the affective states that people ideally want to feel. First, I define ideal affect and describe the cultural causes and behavioral consequences of ideal affect. To illustrate these points, I compare American and East Asian cultures, which differ in their valuation of high-arousal positive affective states (e.g., excitement, enthusiasm) and low-arousal positive affective states (e.g., calm, peace-fulness). I then introduce affect valuation theory, which integrates ideal affect with current models of affect and emotion and, in doing so, provides a new framework for understanding how cultural and temperamental factors may shape affect and behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00043.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through its institutions, meanings, and practices, culture accounts for a significant portion of the objective and symbolic macro- and micro-conditions that influence whether and how certain aspects of the self develop and are expressed.

    “Through the institutions, meanings, and practices that comprise it, culture accounts for a significant portion of the objective and symbolic macro-and micro-conditions which influence whether and how certain aspects of the self develop and are expressed -for example, the value given to ego-focused traits such as self-esteem (Tsai, 2007), or whether self-disclosure and self-expression are normative”

    From Self and identity in personality psychology (2021) · cites this paper as Tsai, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, J. L.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Tsai, Jeanne L.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2007-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
242-259
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2128365803
Cited by
781
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
17.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
ideal affect, positive affect, affective states, cultural differences, emotions, temperament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review