Cited by 7Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementGlobal Healthcare and Medical Tourism

Urban professionals’ restorative tourism: exploring the role of perceived environmental restorativeness, push and pull motivations and destination attributes on tourism expectations

Open access
Ding, Xianyao, Xu, Jiajun·2024·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Introduction: Urban professionals often seek respite from their daily routines through restorative tourism, driven by a complex interplay of motivations that include both internal "push" factors and external "pull" factors. This study investigates the intricate relationship between the perceived environmental restorativeness of tourist destinations and the expectations of urban professionals engaging in restorative tourism. Furthermore, it examines how push and pull motivations mediate this relationship while also considering the moderating effect of destination attributes. Methods: The multiple regression analyses on the survey data collected from 221 urban professionals with restorative tourism experiences provided quantitative evidence regarding the hypothesized relationships among perceived environmental restorativeness, push and pull motivations, destination attributes, and tourism expectations. Results: The results showed that perceived environmental restorativeness has a positive effect on urban professionals' tourism expectations; urban professionals' pull motivation and push motivation each play a mediating role between perceived environmental restorativeness and tourist expectations; and restorative tourism destination attributes have a moderating effect between perceived environmental restorativeness and push motivation, as well as the relationship between perceived environmental restorativeness and pull motivation. Discussion: This study provides essential theoretical contributions to restorative tourism and practical implications when designing restorative tourism destinations that target urban professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293050

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rural tourism, tourists often prioritize personal restorative experiences and emotional bonds over a straightforward cognitive evaluation of destination image.

    “In rural tourism, research shows that tourists often prioritize personal restorative experiences and emotional bonds over a straightforward cognitive evaluation of destination image (Huang and Bu, 2022; Ding and Xu, 2024).”

    From A study on the influence of rural tourism’s perceived destination restorative qualities on loyalty based on SOR model (2025) · cites this paper as Ding and Xu, 2024

    The Introduction describes urban professionals seeking relaxation and recovery at restorative destinations, and Hypothesis testing links perceived environmental restorativeness to tourism expectations. But the paper does not establish that rural tourists prioritize emotional bonds or restorative experiences over cognitive evaluations of destination image; its findings concern urban professionals and do not make that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a quiet and close-to-nature environment, it is easier for visitors to engage in inner thinking and self-examination, thereby reassessing life goals, values and their own potential, and enhancing the realization experience.

    “In the quiet and close-to-nature environment, it is easier for visitors to engage in inner thinking and self-examination, thereby reassessing life goals, values and their own potential, and enhancing the realization experience (Løvoll et al., 2020; Ding and Xu, 2024).”

    From A study on the influence of rural tourism’s perceived destination restorative qualities on loyalty based on SOR model (2025) · cites this paper as Ding and Xu, 2024

    The Introduction says that connecting with nature helps people step away from daily routines, consider their goals from a different angle, and feel calm. It does not address self-examination, reassessing values or personal potential, or an enhanced realization experience. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, X., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
  • Xihua University (CN)
  • Dong-Eui University (KR)
Corresponding author
Xu, Jiajun
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-03-19
Volume
15
Pages
1293050-1293050
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392967033
Cited by
7
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Xihua University
  • Sichuan Normal University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Keywords
urban professionals, push motivation, pull motivation, destination attributes, tourist expectations, destination design, work-life balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review