The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymer Blends
Abstract
The concept of appropriately combining two or more different polymers to obtain a new material system with the desirable features of its constituents is not new. Over the years, numerous systems based on the chemical combination of different monomers through random, block, and graft copolymerization methods have been developed with this goal in mind. For similar reasons, the coatings and rubber industries have long blended together different polymers, and particularly over the last decade the interest in polymer blend systems as a way to meet new market applications with minimum development cost has rapidly increased. This approach has not been without its difficulties and has not developed as rapidly as it might have, in part because most physical blends of different high molecular weight polymers prove to be immiscible. That is, when mixed together, the blend components are likely to separate into phases containing predominantly their own kind. This characteristic, combined with the often low physical attraction forces across the phase boundaries, usually causes immiscible blend systems to have poor mechanical properties. Despite this difficulty, a number of physical blend systems have been commercialized, and some of these are discussed later. However, there are ways around this problem of compatibility. Much research has shown that there are many truly miscible polymer pairs that can lead to significant opportunities for new products. Even for immiscible pairs, proper control of phase morphology during processing and/or the addition of “compatibilizing” agents can improve the interfacial situation mentioned above.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Random Reorganization of Molecular Weight Distribution in Linear Condensation Polymers1
Flory, P. J. (1942) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01261a049 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Structure and mechanical properties of poly(?,?-lactic acid)/poly(ɛ-caprolactone) blends
Broz, M. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00314-4 · Cited by 388
Why is recycling of postconsumer plastics so challenging?
Vogt, B. D., Stokes, K. K., & Kumar, S. K. (2021) · ACS Applied Polymer Materials · doi:10.1021/acsapm.1c00648 · Cited by 385
Phase continuity and inversion in polymer blends and simultaneous interpenetrating networks
Jordhamo, G. M., Manson, J. A., & Sperling, L. H. (1986) · Polymer Engineering & Science · doi:10.1002/pen.760260802 · Cited by 359
Aversa, C., Barletta, M., Cappiello, G., & Gisario, A. (2022) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111304 · Cited by 213
Deng, Y., Yu, C., Wongwiwattana, P., & Thomas, N. L. (2018) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-018-1256-x · Cited by 193
“Paul and Barlow [21] and Jordhamo et al.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, D. R., & Barlow, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part C
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-168
- ISSN
- 0736-6574 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1797
- 1520-5746
- OpenAlex
- W2769215418
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymer Blends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222358008080917
- The paper
- Paul, D. R., & Barlow, J. W. (1980). Polymer Blends. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part C. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222358008080917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.